Can Pappus' Theorem Explain the Gaps on a Torus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition Theorem
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pappus's_centroid_theorem (the second one)

When we do this with a torus, wouldn't we gaps tiny gaps between the discs on the outer edge? The slices are closer together on the inner edge and this prevents them from getting any closer on the outer edge so shouldn't we have some gaps?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that Pappus theorem originally comes from an integral proof. With integration, each "slice" has an infinitesimally small width, a width at which you could completely disregard the physical laws of "having gaps because the slice has a uniform width". This is the difference between a summation and an integral.

To further illustrate things, imagine you have a curve and you want the area under it. If you take rectangular slices, you'll never be able to cover the entire area, and you're going to have gaps. However, if these rectangular slices are infinitesimally small, the gaps are going to grow smaller, until you reach a point where the width of the slice is 0, and the unaccounted gaps are therefore also 0.

Here's an image for further comprehension of the idea. Notice how gaps get smaller. It's the same way with applying Pappus theorem to a torus.
Riemann Sums GIF
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top