Can Pappus' Theorem Explain the Gaps on a Torus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Pappus' Theorem raises questions about potential gaps when applied to a torus, particularly due to the varying distances between slices on the inner and outer edges. The discussion highlights that while discrete summation may leave gaps, integration allows for infinitesimally small slices, effectively eliminating these gaps. As the width of the slices approaches zero, the unaccounted gaps also diminish, leading to a complete coverage of the area. This principle illustrates how Pappus' Theorem can be reconciled with the geometry of a torus. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applying the theorem accurately in such contexts.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pappus's_centroid_theorem (the second one)

When we do this with a torus, wouldn't we gaps tiny gaps between the discs on the outer edge? The slices are closer together on the inner edge and this prevents them from getting any closer on the outer edge so shouldn't we have some gaps?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that Pappus theorem originally comes from an integral proof. With integration, each "slice" has an infinitesimally small width, a width at which you could completely disregard the physical laws of "having gaps because the slice has a uniform width". This is the difference between a summation and an integral.

To further illustrate things, imagine you have a curve and you want the area under it. If you take rectangular slices, you'll never be able to cover the entire area, and you're going to have gaps. However, if these rectangular slices are infinitesimally small, the gaps are going to grow smaller, until you reach a point where the width of the slice is 0, and the unaccounted gaps are therefore also 0.

Here's an image for further comprehension of the idea. Notice how gaps get smaller. It's the same way with applying Pappus theorem to a torus.
Riemann Sums GIF
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top