Can Pappus' Theorem Explain the Gaps on a Torus?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pappus' Theorem, when applied to a torus, raises the question of whether gaps exist between the discs on the outer edge due to the varying distances of slices. The discussion highlights that while rectangular slices may leave gaps, using infinitesimally small widths in integration eliminates these gaps, aligning with the principles of Pappus' Theorem. The distinction between summation and integration is crucial, as the latter allows for a continuous coverage of the area, thereby resolving the issue of gaps.

PREREQUISITES
  • Pappus' Centroid Theorem
  • Integral calculus
  • Concept of infinitesimal widths
  • Understanding of Riemann sums
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Pappus' Theorem in different geometrical contexts
  • Explore integral calculus techniques for area approximation
  • Investigate the concept of infinitesimals in calculus
  • Learn about Riemann sums and their implications in integration
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators interested in the applications of Pappus' Theorem and the principles of integration in geometry.

autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pappus's_centroid_theorem (the second one)

When we do this with a torus, wouldn't we gaps tiny gaps between the discs on the outer edge? The slices are closer together on the inner edge and this prevents them from getting any closer on the outer edge so shouldn't we have some gaps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that Pappus theorem originally comes from an integral proof. With integration, each "slice" has an infinitesimally small width, a width at which you could completely disregard the physical laws of "having gaps because the slice has a uniform width". This is the difference between a summation and an integral.

To further illustrate things, imagine you have a curve and you want the area under it. If you take rectangular slices, you'll never be able to cover the entire area, and you're going to have gaps. However, if these rectangular slices are infinitesimally small, the gaps are going to grow smaller, until you reach a point where the width of the slice is 0, and the unaccounted gaps are therefore also 0.

Here's an image for further comprehension of the idea. Notice how gaps get smaller. It's the same way with applying Pappus theorem to a torus.
Riemann Sums GIF
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 333 ·
12
Replies
333
Views
19K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K