Can prime fields act two ways on the same abelian group?

imurme8
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
A problem asks to find an abelian group V and a field F such that there exist two different actions, call them \cdot and \odot, of F on V such that V is an F-module.

A usual way to solve this is to take any vector space over a field with a non-trivial automorphism group, and define r\odot \mu to be f(r)\cdot \mu for f\in \text{Aut}(F), f\neq \iota.

My question is: is this essentially the only way? Given two different actions of F on V, can we construct a non-trivial automorphism of F?

Or, a weaker result: can we show that a prime field cannot act in two different ways on a module?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We always have the trivial operation: ##F.V \equiv 0##.
Another example are direct versus semidirect products. And if the automorphism group is large enough, we can have different conjugations.

And ##D_{12} \cong V_4 \ltimes \mathbb{Z}_3 \cong D_6 \times \mathbb{Z}_2## might provide an example as we have two copies of ##\mathbb{Z}_2## here with a different operation on the rest.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top