A Can Probit or Logit Models Be Used on Panel Data with 50 Subjects?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter monsmatglad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Probability
Click For Summary
Probit and logit models can be applied to panel data, but the effectiveness depends on the sample size and bias. With 50 subjects and 20 observations each, there is a sufficient amount of data for statistical analysis. However, the sample is heavily skewed towards large public companies, which limits the generalizability of the findings to smaller firms. Researchers should be cautious about drawing broad conclusions from such a biased sample. Overall, while the models can be used, the inherent biases must be acknowledged.
monsmatglad
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to use probit or logit models on panel data?

Mons
 
Physics news on Phys.org
monsmatglad said:
Is it possible to use probit or logit models on panel data?

Mons
Yes, but depending on the number of people there may not be enough data to do any meaningful statistics. Also, depending on the selection criteria the panel may constitute a very biased sample
 
I have about 50 different "individuals" and (optimally) 20 observations for each. the "individuals" are chosen based on a list of the 50 largest US, public companies at the time of the first observation. Do you see any immediate reasons for concern, based on this information (if I am using this data material for a logit or probit model)?

Mons
 
50 subjects should be enough for reasonable statistics. Your sample is highly biased towards large companies, so your conclusions should not be generalized to smaller companies.
 
  • Like
Likes ZeGato
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.