Cole A.
- 12
- 0
Homework Statement
Prove that if [itex]x^2 + y = 13[/itex] and [itex]y \neq 4[/itex], then [itex]x \neq 3[/itex].
Homework Equations
N.A.
The Attempt at a Solution
The proof itself is simple enough: suppose [itex]x^2 + y = 13[/itex] and [itex]y \neq 4[/itex]. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that [itex]x = 3[/itex]. Then
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> (3)^2 + y &= 13 \\<br /> y &= 4.<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
But this contradicts the knowledge that [itex]y \neq 4[/itex]. Therefore, if [itex]x^2 + y = 13[/itex] and [itex]y \neq 4[/itex], then [itex]x \neq 3[/itex].
The problem I am having is understanding why this is logically valid. Would it be correct to say that, for the statements
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> A &: x^2 + y = 13 \\<br /> B &: y = 4 \\<br /> C &: x = 3,<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
what has been proven is below?
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> &(A \wedge \neg B \wedge C) \rightarrow B \\<br /> \text{which is equivalent to}~ &(A \wedge \neg B) \rightarrow (C \rightarrow B) \\<br /> \text{which is equivalent to}~ &(A \wedge \neg B) \rightarrow (\neg B \rightarrow \neg C) \\<br /> \text{which is equivalent to}~ &(A \wedge \neg B \wedge \neg B) \rightarrow \neg C \\<br /> \text{which is equivalent to}~ &(A \wedge \neg B) \rightarrow \neg C.<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
Is this the proper way to think about the validity of proof by contradiction? (Sorry if this is a dumb question, I'm not a mathematician. What I am finding hard to stomach is identifying [itex]x = 3[/itex] as the contradictory statement when there are actually three statements that were assumed to be true (and thus possible culprits of the contradiction)).