Can Protons and Electrons Combine to Form Neutrons?

Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Dear PF Forum,
I have a question to ask.
Supernovae produce neutron star (or Black Hole).

This is what I summarize from wikipedia.
Proton
Composition: 2 up quarks, 1 down quark
Mass: 1.672621777(74)E-27 kg

Neutron
Composition: 1 up quark, 2 down quarks
Mass: 1.674927351(74)E-27 kg

Electron
Composition: Electron
Mass: 9.10938291(40)×10E-31 kg

1. Is P + e = N? Is it that simple?
Judging by its mass, altough slightly off.
2. Is Up Quark + e = Down Quark?

Thanks for any answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephanus said:
1. Is P + e = N?

No. As you note, p = uud and n = udd, in terms of quarks.

2. Is Up Quark + e = Down Quark?

No. Up and down quarks are both fundamental particles, not composed of other particles, as far as we know.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
jtbell said:
No. As you note, p = uud and n = udd, in terms of quarks.
No. Up and down quarks are both fundamental particles, not composed of other particles, as far as we know.

So, what makes neutron star?
Matter is we know it, consist atom. Proton, Neutron, Electron and I read somewhere, there are abundant neutrinos, too. Altough their combined mass are still much less than combined baryon mass in the universe.
So, if there are Proton, Neutron and Electron, and the result is Neutron star, what makes it?

Thanks.
 
Stephanus said:
So, what makes neutron star?
Mostly neutrons ...

That particles are fundamental does not mean that they cannot be converted into each other. An up quark and an electron may be converted into a down quark and a neutrino by exchanging a W boson. This is what happens in beta decay and when a neutron star is formed (many many many times of course).
 
Orodruin said:
Mostly neutrons ...

That particles are fundamental does not mean that they cannot be converted into each other. An up quark and an electron may be converted into a down quark and a neutrino by exchanging a W boson. This is what happens in beta decay and when a neutron star is formed (many many many times of course).
Thanks Orodruin for your answer, again.
As I know it. The process of producing neutron star is supernova, which happens in 1 seconds. How long is "beta decay"?

Thanks.
 
Stephanus said:
As I know it. The process of producing neutron star is supernova, which happens in 1 seconds. How long is "beta decay"?

The exact name of the interaction would be "electron capture" or one of the inverse beta decays. But still time of interaction won't tell you much. An energy approach can help. In particular the interaction is:
p + e^- \rightarrow n + \nu_e -0.8~MeV
This becomes energetically favorable around at the energies/momenta of the electrons when the white dwarf becomes gravitationally unstable to collapse. And by the end of the collapse, the protons in the core have been converted to neutrons. Neutrons then can't decay back because there is an electron/proton atmosphere in a degenerate state and so the resulting electrons/protons from a neutron beta decay can't find any state to exist in (Pauli-block due to Pauli exclusion principle)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Stephanus
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top