Can Riemann sums accurately calculate the area under a curve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rear Naked
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sums
Rear Naked
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
1) if you have 2 line segments making a right angle, and connect the endpoints with a line segment with an outward curve relative to the vertex, will the area inside always be irrational?

2) if you have 2 line segments making a right angle, and connect the endpoints with a line segment with an inward curve relative to the vertex, will the area inside always be irrational?

3) if we are able to construct the Riemann sum partition points and C values within at any points we wish, is it possible to exactly replicate the value of the integral of a curve?

4) if that same curve fluctuates between concave and convex, the area could be rational right?

riemann.jpg


Basically, can orange area ever equal the green area?

I'm only talking about curves here, not linear functions.Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rear Naked said:
1) if you have 2 line segments making a right angle, and connect the endpoints with a line segment with an outward curve relative to the vertex, will the area inside always be irrational?

No. Look at the area bounded by the curve y = x2, y-axis and y = 1. This area is equal to:

1*1 - \int_0^1 \! x^2 dx = 1 - \frac{1}{3} = \frac{2}{3}

Also, the area under the curve follows the description of 2) and as you can see, the area is also rational.


Rear Naked said:
3)if we are able to construct the Riemann sum partition points and C values within at any points we wish, is it possible to exactly replicate the value of the integral of a curve?

I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be possible, but this will almost never happen.


Rear Naked said:
4) if that same curve fluctuates between concave and convex, the area could be rational right?

Sure.
 
Last edited:
i think you made a mistake when copying number 3?Why do you say it would almost never happen?

If we just chose the C value inside the riemann partition endpoints at random, or chose them to be directly in the center, I see why you would say that...but can we choose that C value, (ie height of rectangle) to be any value, and thus the height could be any value, and thus the areas could be any value, and thus there should always be a C value where the those two colored areas would be equal? Perhaps not ALWAYS, but quite possibly.

Thanks for your help by the way!
 
Fixed
 
Rear Naked said:
If we just chose the C value inside the riemann partition endpoints at random, or chose them to be directly in the center, I see why you would say that

Well, you didn't say that at first! I assumed you were talking about the standard left,right and midpoint riemann sums. If you're allowed to choose how far along the curve each rectangle is, you can get an exact area.

If you want to really simplify this, we only need one rectangle to calculate the exact area of a continuous function:

http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/5/average.1/index.html

This is commonly referred to as the mean value theorem for integrals. Basically, if you're looking at the area of a curve from a to b, there exists a c in [a,b] such that f(c)(b-a) is the area of the curve. In this sense, you only need one rectangle and the height of the rectangle depending on what c is.
 
I did say that at first haha

if we are able to construct the Riemann sum partition points and C values within at any points we wish

thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top