Can Rock, Paper, Scissors Be Reinvented with New Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Rock
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a game where participants respond with objects that "beat" the previous object in a creative and logical manner, following specific rules. The game emphasizes imagination and requires players to respond in the format "Y [verb]'s X," where Y is the new object and X is the previous one. Key rules include no time travel, no people or actions, no fictional objects, no repeats, and a ban on hammers. Participants engage in a back-and-forth exchange, attempting to outdo each other with increasingly elaborate and humorous responses. The conversation often veers into absurdity, with players debating the validity of their responses and the interpretations of the rules. There are moments of confusion and clarification regarding what constitutes a valid response, particularly concerning the timeline of events and the nature of the objects used. The thread showcases a blend of creativity, humor, and playful competition, highlighting the challenges of maintaining the game's structure while allowing for imaginative contributions.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,831
Reaction score
7,829
I rather liked https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110807", and thought it had potential (for imagination that is - HINT HINT :rolleyes:), but it was shut down when it became too silly.

With Evo's permission (granted), and Mattara's permission (pending), I'd like to start it again, but with some boundaries.

1] Reply with an object that "beats" the previous object in some healthy and undeniable way. Replies should be of the form Y [verb]'s X.

Things disallowed:
a] no going back in time. (i.e "no gas" as a reply for chainsaw disallowed) You can act upon the object that was brought, but you cannot change what was brought.
b] no people or actions (man refilling tank disallowed, though I guess can of gas is allowed)
c] no fictional objects or half-baked theoretical objects (repealing nature)
d] no repeats - an object can only be used once
e] no hammers!

(And let's see if we can get a single thread going, rather than multiple branches - though I don't know how).

I'll start it off:

Pen writes post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermite...burns computer with the post, the table, and burns a hole through the ground... (it melts metal, you can't hammer it. Once the reaction starts, nothing can stop it. Its nasty stuff, BEAT THAT!)
 
I have no clue what the original game was about (Dave, you should include a link), so I'm guessing a little here :
DaveC426913 said:
Pen writes post.
Post kills thread.
 
Sorry, the active word is pen. The game is to find something that beats pen.

eg. Tin snips cut pen.
 
Off-topic: Are maces allowed?
 
Sulfuric acid dissolves tin snips.

(See, I can play nice too.)
 
Lye neutralizes acid
 
H20 dissolves resultant salt.
 
Hummingbird drinks H20
 
  • #10
Birdflu kills hummingbird.
 
  • #11
Vaccine prevents bird flu.

Edit: hmmm, sorry, this may be against "no going back in time"
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Orefa said:
Vaccine prevents bird flu.
FDA requires further testing of vaccine before allowing it to go on market.
 
  • #13
Orefa said:
Vaccine prevents bird flu.

Edit: hmmm, sorry, this may be against "no going back in time"
I believe it does.

Birdflu kills hummingbird is the last proper thing posted to defeat.
 
  • #14
zoobyshoe said:
I believe it does.

Birdflu kills hummingbird is the last proper thing posted to defeat.
DDT eradicates birds.

Edit: What a lame post. DDT kills bugs and birds eat bugs, but it will take years to eradicate birds. It'll never work in time to stop an outbreak of birdflu.
 
  • #15
Gamma ray bursts kills all life on Earth, and in extension, kills bird flu.
 
  • #16
  • #17
arildno said:
Gamma ray bursts kills all life on Earth, and in extension, kills bird flu.
Yikes!

...
 
  • #19
flames, it will melt the hammer and everything around it
 
  • #20
We suck at this game.
 
  • #21
Offended contestant spits on Simon Cowell.

(I realize this probably makes no sense right now, but the rules said nothing about traveling into the future.)
 
  • #22
Nail pokes Offended contestant.
 
  • #23
Offended contestant was gay (reverses nail effect)
 
  • #24
Gay Offended Contestant was exposed to high concentrations of Beta radiation.
 
  • #25
You homophobe..:frown:
 
  • #26
I'll go back and lower the ante:

Cat kills hummingbird.
 
  • #27
Scissors kills cat.
 
  • #28
arildno said:
Scissors kills cat.
Bulldozer runs over scissors.
 
  • #29
Bull wakes up and stops dozing.
 
  • #30
I melt arildnos stupid hammer with thermite.
 
  • #31
BobG said:
Offended contestant spits on Simon Cowell.

(I realize this probably makes no sense right now, but the rules said nothing about traveling into the future.)
:D Actually, time travel violates rule c]
 
  • #32
Violation of rule e) kills Dave..
 
  • #33
OK, Arildno, we get that you're really clever in finding imaginative ways to diverge from the spirit of the game.

We get it.

Really.
 
  • #34
DaveC426913 said:
OK, Arildno, we get that you're really clever in finding imaginative ways to diverge from the spirit of the game.

We get it.

Really.
Oh, you're just in a bad mood because you're dead. :-p
 
  • #35
Patience overcomes ban on traveling into the future.
 
  • #36
I took away his stupid hammer, damn that hammer I hate it.
 
  • #37
No proper post took care of my gamma rays. If you want to be the arbiter, Dave, the game should restart there.
 
  • #38
A short fluctuation in gravity causes the moon to smash into the earth. Rock kills rock.
 
  • #39
Bull wakes up and stops dozing.
Bull walks into a minefield.
 
  • #40
arildno said:
No proper post took care of my gamma rays. If you want to be the arbiter, Dave, the game should restart there.

GRB violates rule #1. It did not beat "the previous object" (hummingbird or bird flu), it beat an object that was made up from thin air (all life on Earth).
 
  • #41
Interestingly, I'm finding a confounding paradox with rule a]. Technically, everything listed is going back in time, including the tin snips cutting pen.

The only way the tin snaps could beat the pen is by cutting it *before* it wrote the post. And the only way sulfuric acid could beat the tin snips is if it dissolved them before they cut the pen, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
DaveC426913 said:
GRB violates rule #1. It did not beat "the previous object" (hummingbird or bird flu), it beat an object that was made up from thin air (all life on Earth).
Ok, fair enough.
 
  • #43
Hm. To recap. Looking for a valid chain.

The bird flu/DDT line may or may not be valid - I'm really having trouble with this 'stopped before it happened' paradox.

In an effort to continue, I suggest (somewhat arbitrarily) we choose the more innocuous reply (the cat), and continue with it.

(Gee, I really wasn't expecting to have to arbitrate...)

Anyway, I'll post this as a recap:

Pen writes post.
Tin snips cut pen.
Sulfuric acid dissolves tin snips.
Lye neutralizes acid.
H20 dissolves resultant salt.
Hummingbird drinks H20.
Birdflu kills hummingbird.
Cat kills hummingbird.
Scissors kills cat.
Bulldozer runs over scissors.
 
  • #44
DaveC426913 said:
Interestingly, I'm finding a confounding paradox with rule a]. Technically, everything listed is going back in time, including the tin snips cutting pen.

The only way the tin snaps could beat the pen is by cutting it *before* it wrote the post. And the only way sulfuric acid could beat the tin snips is if it dissolved them before they cut the pen, etc.
Ahhh! "Vaccine prevents bird flu" would have been fine then. :biggrin: [Tapping self in the back.]
 
  • #45
Quicksands swallow bulldozer.
 
  • #46
Orefa said:
Quicksands swallow bulldozer.
Conveniently nearby hanging vines foil quicksand
 
  • #47
Concrete solidifies quicksand.
 
  • #48
Simultaneous postings foil Dave's game.
 
  • #49
Note: Unless anyone else disagrees, I think that OP (Dave) should have the right to slap the thread back into place, as long as he provides a good reason for it.
 
  • #50
arildno said:
Note: Unless anyone else disagrees, I think that OP (Dave) should have the right to slap the thread back into place, as long as he provides a good reason.
Well, Jelfish is on top...

Oh, woops, I'm not Dave, am I? :buggrin:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top