Can Scalar and YM Lagrangians Be Written Using Tetrads and Spin Connection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields General
Dox
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody!

I'm studing some classical field theory in general backgrounds. Of course the most beautiful way of doing so is using differential forms. For example, the lagrangian density of a massless scalar field would be
L_{\phi}=d\phi\wedge * d\phi,​
while the lagrangian density for a YM field is
L_{YM}=\left<d_A A\wedge *d_A A\right>.​

However, once one is interested in adding spinors, tetrads (and spin connection) enter into action...
L_{\psi}=\epsilon_{abcd}\bar{\psi}\Gamma^a e^b e^c e^d (d+\omega)\psi,​
with e^{a} the tetrad 1-form and \omega
the spin-connection 1-form.

Although all lagrangian densities are coordinate independent, they are written in different ways... Is there a form of writing the first two using tetrads and spin connection?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
</code>Yes, there is a way to write the first two lagrangian densities using tetrads and spin connection. The lagrangian density of a massless scalar field can be written as:L_{\phi} = e^{a} \wedge *(e_a \wedge d\phi)where e^{a} is the tetrad 1-form and * denotes the Hodge dual.The lagrangian density for a YM field can be written as:L_{YM}=\left<e^{a}\wedge *F_{ab}\wedge e^b\right>, where F_{ab} is the curvature 2-form associated with the spin connection 1-form, \omega. Hope this helps!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top