Can someone explain Euclid's Algorithm to me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm Explain
AI Thread Summary
Euclid's Algorithm is being misunderstood due to unclear explanations in the referenced book, which contains erroneous statements and confusing notations. The user expresses frustration over the mathematical assertion that 212 equals 106.2, questioning its validity. After seeking clarification, they find that the algorithm is straightforward but still struggle to grasp the concepts presented. The discussion highlights the need for clearer educational resources on Euclid's Algorithm. Overall, the user feels relieved to have received help and is reconsidering their academic path.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
My book is utterly useless - it vaguely gives me a history behind it, its motivations, and then lists an example in which it precedes to write a bunch of utterly false statements and then just.. spits out the answer.

Can someone explain to me what on Earth is going on in the attached picture? If this is not a notational confusion or typos in my book, then I must assert that Euclid's Algorithm makes absolutely no sense. 212 = 106.2, therefore here you go. I demand the author be sent to the lunatic asylum immediately.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140324_164917653.jpg
    IMG_20140324_164917653.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 442
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about you rotate that scan and try to get as much of the explanation as you can.
 
Ok, I just looked it up online and it is fairly straight forward. I just don't understand how you can write the mathematical statement 212 = 106.2 + 0 and be ok with that. It makes me want to torch the book. I still have no idea what they are doing even after getting a coherent explanation.
 
1MileCrash said:
My book is utterly useless - it vaguely gives me a history behind it, its motivations, and then lists an example in which it precedes to write a bunch of utterly false statements and then just.. spits out the answer.

Can someone explain to me what on Earth is going on in the attached picture? If this is not a notational confusion or typos in my book, then I must assert that Euclid's Algorithm makes absolutely no sense. 212 = 106.2, therefore here you go. I demand the author be sent to the lunatic asylum immediately.
1.106 is meaning 1 times 106, I think...
 
  • Like
Likes Michael Hardy
Mandelbroth said:
1.106 is meaning 1 times 106, I think...

Oh thank goodness, now I don't have to switch majors.

Thanks you two.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top