Can someone explain string theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around string theory, exploring its concepts, models, and the challenges associated with understanding it. Participants express interest in both the theoretical framework and its implications, while also addressing the complexity of the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that string theory encompasses several different models, suggesting that these models do not necessarily "work" in a conventional sense but rather exist as distinct frameworks.
  • Another participant recommends reading introductory materials, such as Wikipedia and a book titled "String Theory for Dummies," to gain a foundational understanding.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding the connection between perturbative string theory and quantum field theory, specifically through the worldline formalism and its implications for understanding higher-dimensional theories.
  • The discussion includes a reference to the challenges of generalizing perturbative string theory to dimensions greater than two, with a specific focus on the significance of two-dimensional theories in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interest in string theory, with some suggesting that the topic may be challenging for newcomers. There is no consensus on the best approach to explain string theory, and multiple perspectives on its complexity and accessibility remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate that the discussion may be limited by the varying backgrounds of those involved, which could affect comprehension of the technical aspects of string theory.

Armando Valle
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain string theory? and how it works please? I am really interested thanks :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Armando Valle said:
Can someone explain string theory? and how it works please? I am really interested thanks :D

There's are several different things that could fall under the umbrella of string theory. The different models don't "work", they just are. Can you elaborate more?

Judging from your post in the academic section, you probably will have difficulty grasping anything said here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mrnike992
The single best way to conceptually understand what perturbative string theory really is about and why it is a natural concept to consider, is to first understand that ordinary perturbative quantum field theory has an equivalent formulation that is called the worldline formalism. In this formulation each Feynman diagram appearing in the computation of the S-matrix is identified with the correlator of a 1-dimensional quantum field theory, namely with the worldline theory of the first quantized particles that are the given quanta.

This worldline formalism in itself is highly interesting, as it is this formulation that most directly connects quantum field theory to zeta function regularization and hence to the mathematics of zeta functions and hence to structures famous in number theory. But for the purposes of the present question, of course the following aspect is relevant:

If the perturbation series of a quantum field theory is the sum over all appropriate 1-dimensional graphs of the correlators of a 1-dimensional worldline field theory, then...
...is there a generalization of this where one instead does a sum over d-dimensional spaces of the correlators of a d-dimensional worldsheet theory, as this is an immediate generalization?

And the answer is that doing this for d > 2 seems to be impossible. Doing it for d = 2 gives perturbative string theory.

More exposition that presents string theory along these lines is in
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haushofer, Student100, JorisL and 1 other person
Closed pending moderation

Edit: a whole lot of off topic posts were removed, and the thread will remain closed
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
11K