Can Someone Explain the Calculation of Work Done by Gas Expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the calculation of work done by gas expansion. The initial formula presented is w = -Fx, which represents work done against a force. The user struggles with understanding the negative sign in the equation for work done by the system on the surroundings, W' = -Fx, and how it relates to the external pressure. Clarification is provided that if F represents the opposing force, the work done on the system is indeed -Fx, while the work done by the system is expressed as Fx. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the direction of forces in work calculations.
lipwe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have little confusion about understanding a lecture note for calculation of work done by a expansion of gas.

According to text, Work done against a force w= - Fx

So work done on the system by surrounding when piston moving w = - P(external)(power exert by outside force on the piston) . X

but I did not get this one.

Work done by the system on surrounding. According to text

W' = -Fx
I did not get this point (minus in front of F) as what ever force exert by system on should be in the direction of movement and in this case exact opposite of - P(external) Am I right? ) but equation gives the right answer i.e w'= - (- P(external))x= P(external )X . In-contrast my one is incorrect

Can somebody help me out to clear this . Thanks for your time in advanced
Modify message
Report to moderator 68.228.44.236
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A bit of semantics here. If F is the force you are pushing against, then the force you must exert is -F, thus the work you do on the system is -Fx.

On the other hand, if F is the force you exert, then the work you do is simply Fx.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top