Say I have two 3d vector functions A and B(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I would intuitively think that the xhat component of (A dot Nabla)B

would be

(dAx/dx+dAy/dy+dAz/dz)Bx

but my book gives it as

Ax*dBx/dx + Ay*dBx/dy + Az*dBx/dz

why is this so?

why isn't A dot nabla equal to (dAx/dx+dAy/dy+dAz/dz)?

My book says that the dot product of 2 vectors is commutative, and it says hat although the del operator is not exactly a vector, we can treat it as such in most cases. It never mentions that taking dot products is NOT one of those cases, yet from this it seems that

A dot nabla is NOT equal to nabla dot A

I've been trying to prove the dot product rule for gradients for 2 hours and It is not working out cause I kept doing (A dot nabla)B and (B dot nabla)A the way I thought they should be done, which gives different results from how they are apparently supposed to be done, but the proper way contradicts what I thought I knew about the del operator so clearly I have some kind of misconception that I need straightened out. Thanks!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Can someone explain this about gradients to me?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**