Can Someone Explain This Logarithmic Property Discrepancy?

Rafe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
sorry this should go under the " Homework, Coursework, & Textbook Questions" forum. please delete. i will repost.

Okay i did a search for logarithmic properties and logarithms and couldn't seem to find an explanation for how this particular property works.
(log base c of a ) ^ b = b (log base c of a)
when i input simple numbers like :
PHP:
a=4
b=3
c=2
Log base 2 of 4 obvioussly the answer is 2, but
2^3 /= (does not equel) 3 x 2.
i dont' know how to make sense of this discrepency. i imagine I'm just reading it wrong.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You must be reading it wrong. Let x=(log base c of a). Then your equation reads x^b=bx, which in general is wrong.

A correct expression is:

(log base c of a^b)=b(log base c of a)

It looks close to what you wrote, so it may be what was meant.
 
Rafe said:
sorry this should go under the " Homework, Coursework, & Textbook Questions" forum. please delete. i will repost.

Okay i did a search for logarithmic properties and logarithms and couldn't seem to find an explanation for how this particular property works.
(log base c of a ) ^ b = b (log base c of a)
when i input simple numbers like :
PHP:
a=4
b=3
c=2
Log base 2 of 4 obvioussly the answer is 2, but
2^3 /= (does not equel) 3 x 2.
i dont' know how to make sense of this discrepency. i imagine I'm just reading it wrong.

As mathman said, what you have: (log base c of a)^b = b(log base c of a), more simply written as
\left(log_c a\right)^b= b log_c a
is not true.

Yes, you are reading it wrong. What is true is that
log_c\left(a^b\right)= b log_c(a)

How you would prove that depends on exactly which definition of log_c you are using.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top