Can someone explain this physics passage and picture?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of liquids in conical capillaries, particularly how the curvature of the liquid surface affects pressure differences at each end of the tube. A smaller radius creates a larger concave surface, resulting in a higher pressure difference due to Laplace's law, which relates pressure to surface curvature. This leads to water being drawn into narrower sections of the capillary, as the pressure inside the smaller cap is lower than that in the larger cap. The effects of wetting also play a significant role, with water maximizing contact with the glass, while mercury minimizes it. Overall, the interplay between curvature, pressure differences, and wetting properties explains the liquid's movement in capillaries.
Pete2s
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
On page 319 of this book, with regards to the conical capillaries: http://books.google.com/books?id=Eo...det&sig=Xr8x61FArV8fK4r0vpR_McJlQIk#PPA319,M1

One particular point that I feel needs further clarifying is that "...and the liquid is drawn in the direction of the of the greatest force per unit of area."

It leaves me with a lot of questions. I know water moves up the sides of the tube and pulls the water with it, leaving a concave surface. But why is there a larger concave surface when the radius gets smaller?

Why is there a pressure difference at each end of the tubes?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force to draw water up is proportional to the circumstance of the capillary (F ~2.pi.R), while the weight of the water drawn is propotional to the volume V: V = h.pi.R^2. Then you can see h depends on R reciprocally: smaller the radius, the higher the water column drawn up.
 
Thanks but did you look at the picture in the link?

Maybe I should ask in steps: why does a smaller radius pull water more than a larger radius? If you look at the pictures, you'll see the drop of water is pulled toward the smaller end.

EDIT - in addition, the capillary is turned sideways so that gravity and weight of water is not a factor.
 
I'm sorry, I can not retrieve the picture.
 
There is an unbalanced force. There's two semi-independent effects; one of wetting and one of the pressure jump across the surface.

For the Hg in glass, since mercury does not wet the glass, it tries to minimize the amount of Hg in contact with the glass. In the picture, the water wets the glass, and so the water tries to maximize the contact area.

Now, becasue both ends of the fluid column contain (roughly) spherical caps of different diameters, there is an unbalanced pressure: Laplace's law equates the pressure jump (i.e. force per unit area) to the surface curvature.

For Hg, the interior pressure is higher than the exterior pressure, and so the smaller cap exists at a higher pressure and the fluid moves to the larger diameter region of the capillary.

For water, the interior pressure is lower than the exterior pressure, and so the smaller cap is at a lower pressure than the larger cap, and so the fluid is pulled into the smaller region of the capillary.

Clever idea, actually...
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top