Can someone explain to me this process?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xuekai Du
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Process
Xuekai Du
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
π- + p→Λ + K0
Why is this a strong interaction instead of weak? Since the quark content changed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strong interaction can produce (and eliminate) quark+antiquark pairs of the same type. Like gluon -> strange + antistrange.
The interaction here does not have to be strong but that is by far the most likely process.
 
  • Like
Likes Xuekai Du
Xuekai Du said:
Since the quark content changed.

But the net flavor did not.
 
  • Like
Likes Xuekai Du
Xuekai Du said:
π- + p→Λ + K0
Why is this a strong interaction instead of weak? Since the quark content changed.
1) It is pure hadronic interaction, and 2) strangeness is conserved: Strangeness-conserving hadronic interactions can not be weak.
 
samalkhaiat said:
Strangeness-conserving hadronic interactions can not be weak.
This isn't a general rule. Hadronic-only strangeness-changing processes must be weak, but hadronic-only strangeness-conserving processes needn't be strong. The example in the original post can proceed via strong, weak, or electromagnetic diagrams (albeit that does mean it would be called "strong" since that diagram will dominate). The decay ##B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^{^-} \pi^+## conserves strangeness but proceeds only weakly since bottomness and charmness are changed.
 
Envelope said:
This isn't a general rule. Hadronic-only strangeness-changing processes must be weak, but hadronic-only strangeness-conserving processes needn't be strong. The example in the original post can proceed via strong, weak, or electromagnetic diagrams (albeit that does mean it would be called "strong" since that diagram will dominate). The decay ##B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^{^-} \pi^+## conserves strangeness but proceeds only weakly since bottomness and charmness are changed.
My statement was about light hadrons, i.e., flavour SU(3). Of course, if you include heavy quarks, then you can have weak decays in which the s-quark behaves as spectator giving | \Delta S | = 0.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top