Can someone explain to me this process?

In summary, the interaction between π- and p, resulting in Λ and K0 particles, is considered a strong interaction because it involves the production and elimination of quark-antiquark pairs of the same type, such as gluon -> strange + antistrange. While the quark content changes, the net flavor remains the same. However, this is not a general rule as hadronic-only strangeness-conserving processes do not have to be strong. The example in the conversation can proceed via strong, weak, or electromagnetic diagrams. Additionally, the statement about strangeness-conserving hadronic interactions only being weak applies to light hadrons, but not to processes involving heavy quarks.
  • #1
Xuekai Du
3
0
π- + p→Λ + K0
Why is this a strong interaction instead of weak? Since the quark content changed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The strong interaction can produce (and eliminate) quark+antiquark pairs of the same type. Like gluon -> strange + antistrange.
The interaction here does not have to be strong but that is by far the most likely process.
 
  • Like
Likes Xuekai Du
  • #3
Xuekai Du said:
Since the quark content changed.

But the net flavor did not.
 
  • Like
Likes Xuekai Du
  • #4
Xuekai Du said:
π- + p→Λ + K0
Why is this a strong interaction instead of weak? Since the quark content changed.
1) It is pure hadronic interaction, and 2) strangeness is conserved: Strangeness-conserving hadronic interactions can not be weak.
 
  • #5
samalkhaiat said:
Strangeness-conserving hadronic interactions can not be weak.
This isn't a general rule. Hadronic-only strangeness-changing processes must be weak, but hadronic-only strangeness-conserving processes needn't be strong. The example in the original post can proceed via strong, weak, or electromagnetic diagrams (albeit that does mean it would be called "strong" since that diagram will dominate). The decay ##B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^{^-} \pi^+## conserves strangeness but proceeds only weakly since bottomness and charmness are changed.
 
  • #6
Envelope said:
This isn't a general rule. Hadronic-only strangeness-changing processes must be weak, but hadronic-only strangeness-conserving processes needn't be strong. The example in the original post can proceed via strong, weak, or electromagnetic diagrams (albeit that does mean it would be called "strong" since that diagram will dominate). The decay ##B_s^0 \rightarrow D_s^{^-} \pi^+## conserves strangeness but proceeds only weakly since bottomness and charmness are changed.
My statement was about light hadrons, i.e., flavour [itex]SU(3)[/itex]. Of course, if you include heavy quarks, then you can have weak decays in which the s-quark behaves as spectator giving [itex]| \Delta S | = 0[/itex].
 

Related to Can someone explain to me this process?

1. What is the purpose of this process?

The purpose of this process is to explain a specific concept or procedure in a clear and understandable way.

2. How does this process work?

This process typically involves breaking down a complex concept or procedure into smaller, more manageable steps and providing explanations for each step.

3. Who can benefit from this process?

This process can benefit anyone who is seeking a better understanding of a particular topic or procedure. It can be particularly helpful for those who are new to the subject or have limited prior knowledge.

4. How do I know if this process is accurate?

The accuracy of this process depends on the source of the information and the expertise of the person explaining it. It is always important to fact-check and verify information from reliable sources.

5. Can this process be applied to other topics or procedures?

Yes, this process can be applied to a wide range of topics and procedures. The key is to break down the information into manageable steps and provide clear explanations for each step.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
932
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top