Can someone explain to me work and potential energy and when they are

AI Thread Summary
Work and potential energy are interconnected through the Work-Energy Theorem, which states that work done on a system results in a change in kinetic energy (W = ΔKE). Negative work occurs when a system loses energy, such as when a force opposes motion, leading to a decrease in kinetic energy. This relationship is expressed in the conservation of energy equation, ΔKE + ΔPE = 0, indicating that a decrease in kinetic energy corresponds to an increase in potential energy. The negative sign in the integral of electric field relates to the convention that energy lost by the system results in negative work. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between work, kinetic energy, and potential energy in physics.
jaredvert
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
And when they are negative. I have grasped most of my textbook but this seemingly easy concept keeps going over my head. I'm in e and m right now but still can't understand why it is Vba= - integral a to b E times dl.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The Work-Energy Theorem states that work and energy are really the same thing!

Work is defined as:

<br /> W = \int \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{x}<br />

Which we can prove is equivalent to (in a force-field free environment):

<br /> W = \Delta KE<br />

We know:

<br /> \vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}<br />

with \vec{p}=m\vec{v}. Then:

<br /> \vec{F} = \frac{d}{dt} (m\vec{v})<br />

Multiply both sides by \vec{v}:

<br /> \vec{F}\cdot\vec{v}=m\vec{v}\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}<br />

And we know \vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt}:

<br /> \vec{F}\cdot\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt}=m\vec{v}\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}<br />

Dropping the differential time:

\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{x} = mv\cdot dv<br />

I've also dropped the vectors on the velocity, as \vec{v} and d\vec{v} are in the same direction. If we integrate both sides we find:

<br /> W = \int{\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{x}} = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 = \Delta KE<br />

2. From above you should notice that a negative change in kinetic energy relates to a negative work. This is all depending on the conventions used. Modern physics uses the convention that when the system loses energy, the work is negative.

For example: pushing a block along a surface. If the block was already moving towards you and you wanted to stop the block it would have to lose energy, and at the same time you would be gaining energy. If the block had large enough kinetic energy, you would move with the block (gaining energy). In fact, the block would be doing work on you, so in other words when the system does work on the force-provider, it is negative work.

3. Using the conservation of energy:

<br /> \Delta KE + \Delta PE = 0<br />

in a closed system. Therefore:

<br /> \Delta KE = - \Delta PE<br />

Which leads to the work being defined as:

<br /> W = \Delta KE = -\Delta PE<br />

So you can see that just by the convention that a system losing kinetic energy is negative work, we arrive to your original problem of why the potential energy is negative the integral of the force. It's there merely by convention and intuition about how things should work. If we look at the electric potential:

<br /> V = k\frac{Q}{r}<br />

We see:

<br /> \frac{dV}{dr} = -\frac{kQ}{r^2} = -E<br />

or:

<br /> E(r) = -\frac{dV}{dr}<br />

If we integrate both sides with respect to dr from point a to point b:

<br /> V(b)-V(a) = -\int\limits_a^b{E\cdot dr}<br />

4. I'm not sure if you've done this yet in your class, but you will soon. The scalar potential field is conservative, so it doesn't matter which path you take, so you usually see the potential written as a terrifying line-integral:

<br /> V(b)-V(a) = -\int\limits_C{\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{\ell}}<br />
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top