Can someone show mw the working out here

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tracee
  • Start date Start date
Tracee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Q = C (90pF) x V (25 volts)
90 x 10e-12
x 25 = 2.25 x 10e-9 Coulombs (2.25nC)
I get this equation for charge but my maths is letting me down.
How do I get from 90pF (90 to power of -12) x 25 = 2.25 x 10 to power of -9
I don't know the working out with negative exponents. I may have to duplicate in a test so I need a simple way.
This subject is doing my head in - the chemistry, physics and maths does not come naturally...grrr
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
90pF is not 90 to the power of -12 but rather 90 times 10 to the power of -12.

So you're trying to figure out why

90*10^{-12}*25=2.25*10^{-9}

90*25 = 2250 so

90*25*10^{-12}=2250*10^{-12}
=225*10^{-11}
=22.5*10^{-10}
=2.25*10^{-9}
 
Thanks - especially for pointing out my error. My notes have the 10 and that's what I've been working with, but you've shown how easily I can leave something vital out. This really isn't my area and I'll be glad when this subject is done - at least the physics, maths and chemistry part. The subject is high risk hazards in the workplace.
Your workings are exactly what I needed, just a simple way to get to the end!
Thanks so much.
Back to dealing with the physics of deceleration in free fall and soft landings. Yay!
 
Tracee said:
Thanks - especially for pointing out my error. My notes have the 10 and that's what I've been working with, but you've shown how easily I can leave something vital out. This really isn't my area and I'll be glad when this subject is done - at least the physics, maths and chemistry part. The subject is high risk hazards in the workplace.
I can understand how you could be eager to leave those subjects behind you when every piece of maths that you have to calculate gives you trouble and possibly intimidates you as well. But at least try not to let the subjects leave a sour taste in your mouth as you move on from them. Maths really is elegant in its logic, even if the logic can sometimes be hard to come by.

Tracee said:
Your workings are exactly what I needed, just a simple way to get to the end!
Thanks so much.

Even simpler (although I don't recommend it because you should learn to become comfortable with using the index notations as they pop up everywhere) would be to avoid converting to indices altogether.
90pF * 25 = 2250pF = 2.25nF
Since 1000pF = 1nF.

Tracee said:
Back to dealing with the physics of deceleration in free fall and soft landings. Yay!
Sounds fun! ;)
 
Tracee said:
Q = C (90pF) x V (25 volts)
90 x 10e-12
x 25 = 2.25 x 10e-9 Coulombs (2.25nC)
I get this equation for charge but my maths is letting me down.
How do I get from 90pF (90 to power of -12) x 25 = 2.25 x 10 to power of -9
I don't know the working out with negative exponents. I may have to duplicate in a test so I need a simple way.
This subject is doing my head in - the chemistry, physics and maths does not come naturally...grrr

Working with negative exponents is no different than working with positive exponents. If you can add and subtract negative numbers, you're all set to work with negative exponents. The laws of exponents work the same:

2-2 * 2-4 = 2-2-4 = 2-6 = 1 / 26 = 1/64

24 * 2-2 = 24-2 = 22 = 4

If you continue to study physics and chemistry, you are also going to need to be proficient at working in scientific notation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top