B Can someone solve this exponential equation for me?

AI Thread Summary
The equation 2 = x^(x^(x...)) leads to the conclusion that x equals the square root of 2, approximately 1.4142135. This solution arises from recognizing that the infinite exponentiation can be simplified to x = 2^(1/x). However, the discussion highlights the complexity of exponentiation, noting that the order of operations significantly affects the outcome. It is emphasized that while the square root of 2 satisfies the equation, the reasoning behind the solution is not a formal proof. The conversation also touches on convergence conditions for exponential towers, indicating that not all values yield the same limit.
Ameer Bux
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
2 = X to the power x to the power x, until infinity.

I really need to know how its possible for the answer to be √2
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-02-24 at 5.52.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-02-24 at 5.52.37 PM.png
    56.7 KB · Views: 513
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not totally sure I follow the logic here. It feels like it should be correct... but I'm going to have to read this a few more times! Taken from http://mathforum.org/

Dear Dr. Math,

What is the value of x in the following equation:

' ...
' x
' x
' x
' x
'x = 2

Thank you.

Benno

Date: 10/14/97 at 19:15:09
From: Doctor Tom
Subject: Re: algebra

There's a trick to solving this problem instantly. Since the exponents
go on forever, the exponent of the lowest and leftmost x is the same
as x to that power, so replace the equation by

2
x = 2

So x is the square root of 2, or 1.4142135...
 
Plug in ##\sqrt{2}## for ##x## and solve for ##y## like so:
$$y = \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^\ldots}$$
Since the power tower goes to infinity, this is equivalent to:
$$y=(\sqrt{2})^y$$
Do you see why? Now solve for ##y##. (Or if you like, just plug in ##y=2## and verify that the equation is true.)
 
[edit] I goofed here! see further down...

Well, I think you have a problem. Since $$\left (\left ( \sqrt 2 \right )^\sqrt 2 \right )^\sqrt 2 = 2 $$ I think it should stop at $$ 2 = x^{x^x}$$

You are being lured into the reasoning of post #2, but it's a circular reasoning: IF $$2 = 2^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{...}}}}}}}} $$ THEN x =2 . If not, then not!
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Well, I think you have a problem. Since $$\left (\left ( \sqrt 2 \right )^\sqrt 2 \right )^\sqrt 2 = 2 $$ I think it should stop at $$ 2 = x^{x^x}$$

You are being lured into the reasoning of post #2, but it's a circular reasoning: IF $$2 = 2^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{...}}}}}}}} $$ THEN x =2 . If not, then not!

The problem here is that
$$((\sqrt{2})^{\sqrt{2}})^{\sqrt{2}} \neq \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}}$$ because exponentiation is not associative.
 
Ah! It's me making the mistake ? What are the conventions then to interpret ##
\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}} ## ?

Got it ! o:)

From here :
Without parentheses to modify the order of calculation, by convention the order is top-down, not bottom-up:

acfa11124b1bd069678048a3358eabba.png

Note that some computer programs (notably Microsoft Office Excel) associate to the left instead, i.e. a^b^c is evaluated as (a^b)^c.
And I was just as dumb as XL...
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's different for you, but I've always seen
$$\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}} = \sqrt{2}^{\bigg(\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}\bigg)} $$
It's too early for this much nested LaTeX. :confused:
 
Yeah, it is. (here it is too late, actually -- time to go home :smile: ).

But thanks for putting us me right !
 
The "trick" mentioned by Dr. Tom does in this instance give a correct solution, but it's not a proof. As mentioned by Peter Winkler in his book "Mathematical Puzzles" one has only to consider the similar equation x^{x^{x^{.^{.^.}}}}=4
Using the same logic gives x^4=4, i.e. x=\sqrt{2}. If the "proof" were correct we would then have 2=\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}^{.^{.^.}}}}=4

(Not to mention that x^2=2 actually has two solutions.)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
If a tower of exponentials, defined as the limit of xn as n → ∞, where for some real c > 0 we define

x1 = c
and

xn+1 = cxn,​

actually converges, then it can be proved that c satisfies the inequality

e-e ≤ c e1/e,​

(where e is the famous mathematical constant e = 2.718281828...) or in decimals,

0.065988... ≤ c ≤ 1.444667...,​

and in fact xn will converge for all such c.

It's rather unusual to have a situation like this where the endpoints of the region of convergence are included in the region of convergence!

It's not hard to show that, if we do have convergence to some number S = S(c):

limn→∞ xn = S​

then we must also have

cS = S,​

as suggested above. But, this does not mean that any S satisfying the above equation is necessarily the limit of the xn.

So in particular, the fact that the 4th power of √2 is 4 does not mean that 4 is the limit of the xn for the value c = √2. It most certainly is not.

In fact, it is known that for the lower end of the range of c that gives a convergent tower, we have:

for c = e-e, S = 1/e,​

and at the high end, we have:

for c = e1/e, S = e.​

These facts rule out, for instance, the possibility that for c = √2 we have S = 4.
 
  • #11
I was actually playing Devil's advocate to point out that there was something missing from the original logic.

I did prove that \lim_{n \to \omega}(\sqrt{2} \uparrow\uparrow n)=2 without establishing the convergence range you give. The solution x=-\sqrt{2} also needs to be discounted.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top