Can Spin 2 Bosons Explain Particle Masses and Dark Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rest Spin Yield
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Would a massless spin 2 boson traveling at light speed collide with a fermion to yield particle-antiparticle pairs (if the spin 2 was a graviton the particles would have to have a very small mass so far undetected by science)?
Could this spin 2 boson be electromagnetic in nature?
Could a collision with a fermion produce more than one particle-antiparticle pair per boson? And could bosons turning into fermions in a space saturated with fermions cause that space to expand (in analogy with neutron degeneracy pressure) - can dark energy be accounted for by massless spin 2 becoming spin 1/2 with rest mass?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, a massless spin 2 boson traveling at light speed would not collide with a fermion to yield particle-antiparticle pairs. While it is theoretically possible for a spin 2 boson to interact with fermions, such interactions have never been observed and are not expected to occur with any significant frequency. No, this spin 2 boson could not be electromagnetic in nature. Electromagnetic particles travel at the speed of light, but have a non-zero rest mass. The only massless particles known in nature are the three types of gauge bosons (gluons, photons, and gravitons).No, a collision with a fermion would not produce more than one particle-antiparticle pair per boson. This is because the energy required to create additional particle-antiparticle pairs is greater than the energy available in the collision. No, bosons turning into fermions in a space saturated with fermions would not cause that space to expand. Dark energy is thought to be caused by an underlying property of space itself, rather than the transformation of particles into other particles.
 


The concept of spin 2 bosons and their potential to yield rest masses is still a topic of ongoing research and debate in the field of particle physics. Currently, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest that spin 2 bosons can yield rest masses in the same way that spin 0 Higgs bosons do.

As for the possibility of a massless spin 2 boson colliding with a fermion to yield particle-antiparticle pairs, this is also a topic of speculation and further research. If the spin 2 boson in question is indeed a graviton, then it would require the production of particles with very small masses, which have yet to be detected by science. However, it is important to note that the concept of a massless spin 2 boson is still a theoretical construct and has not been confirmed by experimental evidence.

Regarding the potential electromagnetic nature of a spin 2 boson, this is also a subject of ongoing research. While there are theories that suggest a connection between spin 2 bosons and electromagnetism, this has not been definitively proven and remains a topic of exploration.

As for the possibility of a single spin 2 boson producing more than one particle-antiparticle pair upon colliding with a fermion, this is also a topic of speculation and further study. While it is possible in theory, it would require a deeper understanding of the fundamental forces and interactions at play.

Finally, the idea of bosons turning into fermions in a space saturated with fermions and causing the expansion of space, similar to neutron degeneracy pressure, is an interesting concept. However, it is important to note that this is still a theoretical concept and has not been confirmed by experimental evidence. As for the potential connection to dark energy, this is also a topic of ongoing research and debate, and it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions at this time. More research and experimentation will be needed to fully understand the role of spin 2 bosons and their potential effects on particle-antiparticle pair production and the expansion of space.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
87
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top