Can spin result in an increase of velocity?

AI Thread Summary
A spinning ball can indeed increase its velocity upon hitting the floor, particularly in scenarios involving specific angles and surfaces. The discussion highlights the conversion of angular momentum to linear momentum, suggesting that the interaction can lead to increased speed in the direction of travel. Key equations mentioned include force (f=ma) and torque (T=I alpha), which can be applied to analyze the motion. The phenomenon, likened to a "slam" in ping pong, is influenced by factors such as the ball's material properties and the nature of the impact. Overall, while calculations can be complex due to variable forces and energy conservation, the principles of momentum transfer are central to understanding this effect.
d1v1n1ty nb
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If a spinning ball hits the floor is it possible for it to increase in velocity in the direction it is travelling? If so could you please explain with an example? And what Equations would you use? Thanx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely - you can do all sorts of crazy things with a rubber ball. If you bounce it from the ground to a wall at a low angle (throw it near the corner), you can even get it to bounce back and forth as its direction of spin and direction of motion both reverse every time it hits the ground.

It may be difficult to caluclate (or rather, difficult to get proper data/assumptions), but you could use angular momentum converted to linear momentum.
 
Draw a FBD of the ball in contact with the surface, including friction.
Then just apply f=ma and T=I alpha.
It is called a slam in ping pong.
 
That would be difficult because the force varies and you don't know things like time of contact. It is very dependent on many specific properties of the objects. I was thinking that given a certain elastic modulous, a specific fraction of the angular momentum would be converted to linear momentum.
 
But you can argue "conservation of energy". If the impact reduces the spin, then the energy due to rotation is reduced and can go into linear kinetic energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top