Can staff be bent and how does it compare to modern building materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Material
AI Thread Summary
Staff, a traditional building material, can be bent, but its flexibility is limited compared to modern materials. Fiber reinforced plaster, particularly GFRC (Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete), is preferred today due to its superior strength and versatility. The discussion highlights that GFRC offers advantages in durability and ease of use over staff. Additionally, GRG (Glass Reinforced Gypsum) is favored for its lightweight properties and adaptability in contemporary construction. Overall, modern materials like GFRC and GRG are increasingly chosen over traditional staff for their enhanced performance in building applications.
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top