Can sum1 help me wit this question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter b_ball_gurl87
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the concept of work in physics is examined through the scenario of a swimmer in a river. When the swimmer is stationary relative to the shore, no work is done on him despite the effort exerted, as there is no displacement. Conversely, if the swimmer floats downstream, work is done on him due to the movement with the water flow. The conversation highlights common misconceptions about work, emphasizing that physical exertion does not equate to work unless there is displacement. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the concept of work in physics.
b_ball_gurl87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hey can sum1 help me with this question?

a swimmer is trying to swim upstream in a river with a constant flow of water, but remains stationary relative to shore.

a. is any work being done on the swimmer? explain.

b. if the swimmer stops swimming and floats with the water flow, is any work done on the swimmer? Explain.

please get back to me asap. I am studyn for my test

email be back at b_ball_gurl87@hotmail.com
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...
 
Start with the definition of work.

(Constant force case)
The work done on an object as it travels from one point to another is the force times displacement.

Suppose you're standing on the shore. What is the displacement of the swimmer? So what is the work done on the swimmer?

vincentchan said:
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...

No. This is a common misconception about the concept of work. Do not relate work with physical labour.
Suppose you would hold a heavy book in one hand with outstreched arm. You'd get pretty tired after a while, but since the displacement of the book is zero, NO work is done on the book.
 
Galileo said:
No. This is a common misconception about the concept of work. Do not relate work with physical labour.
Suppose you would hold a heavy book in one hand with outstreched arm. You'd get pretty tired after a while, but since the displacement of the book is zero, NO work is done on the book.

Very good. Just like the situation when a person pushes against an immovable wall.

But can you figure out why a person gets tired if no "work" is actually being done ? (hint : consider micro-scale effects)
 
The original question also did NOT ask if the person had done work. It asked if work was done ON him.

As long as he is stationary, there is no work done on him. If he floats downstream, then work is done on him.
 
vincentchan said:
a very good way to test any work being done on the swimmer is simply asking him, " are you tried ?" if he did, he must have DONE some WORK...


lol :biggrin:
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
View full post »

Similar threads

Frames of Reference and Relative Velocity
Replies
3
Views
6K
Calculating Relative Velocity for a Swimmer Training in a River
Replies
7
Views
2K
Optimizing River Crossing Velocity Vectors
Replies
5
Views
7K
Vector Question: Swimmer Across River Diagram Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Swimming across a river question
Replies
1
Views
6K
Crossing a River: Calculating Angle between Swimmer & Bank
Replies
12
Views
8K
Relative Motion (Swimmer Crossing River Question)
Replies
1
Views
12K
Relative Velocity of two swimmers
Replies
4
Views
7K
How Can a Swimmer Land Directly Across a River with a Current?
Replies
1
Views
3K
About Taylor & Wheeler 3-1 practice problem
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top