Can the air disruptive field (about 3*10^6 V/m) be calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsuwal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the air disruptive field, estimated at about 3*10^6 V/m, and whether this value is empirical or can be derived from the physical properties of O2 and N2 molecules. A calculation attempt based on nitrogen's atomic properties suggests that the electric field produced by its nucleus far exceeds the disruptive field, raising questions about the methodology used. The conversation highlights the role of free electrons and ions in the air, emphasizing the balance between recombination and ionization processes that determine air conductivity. The mean free path length is suggested as a potential method for approximating the disruptive field. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately calculating the air disruptive field.
tsuwal
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
My book says that the air disruptive field (about 3*10^6 V/m). Is this value empirical or can be deduced from the physical properties of O2 and N2 molecules in the atmosphere?

I tried to calculate this disruptive field assuming it to be the field necessary to pull an eletron out of an nitrogen atom. The periodic tables says that the nitrogen atom radius is 60 pm and it's effective atomic number is 3.9 (I assume that the atractive field made by the nucleus is equavalent to that produced by a charge of 3.9 times the carge of the eletron) so the eletric field produced by the nucleus is about 1.6*10^12 N/C. This is way above the disruptive field! How shall I do my math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With your approach, you would calculate the value where no air is possible at all.

There are always some free electrons/ions in the air. They get accelerated along the electric field. If they meet an ion/electron, they can recombine. If they hit an atom with sufficient energy, they can ionize this. So the basic question is: What happens more frequently? If recombination dominates, everything is fine. If ionization dominates, you get more and more electrons and ions and the air begins to conduct.
With the mean free path length, it should be possible to get some approximation.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top