Can the coefficient of static friction be calculated from given information?

AI Thread Summary
A 10KG block on a 30-degree inclined plane raises the question of calculating the coefficient of static friction. The force of friction can be determined, and since static friction is defined as the product of the coefficient of static friction and the normal force, it seems possible to calculate the coefficient. However, static friction varies with the applied force, and while the block is stationary, the coefficient represents maximal static friction, not a fixed value. Therefore, the exact coefficient cannot be determined without additional information about the forces acting on the block. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between static friction and maximal static friction.
Bailey
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
A 10KG block is resting on a plane inclined at an angle of 30 degrees from the horizontal. Find the force of frction holding the block stationary. is it possibel to calculate the exact coefficient of static friction from the above information? explain.


for this quesiton, I can find the force of friction. BUT, since:

static friction = coefficient of static friction * normal force

from the above equation we can solve for the exact coefficient right? since we know the normal force & the friction force.

now i know static frition will vary depending on the force acting on the object, but since the block is stationary, and the force of gravity acting on it is constant, which mean the coefficient of static will not change.

why can't we find the the coefficient of static friction?

:confused:

edit- ops...i just noticed...i should have posted in the classcial physics group...err...can some mod help me move this topic there?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the coefficient is the coefficient of MAXIMAL static friction,not the coefficent of static friction per se.
 
ahhh......thx.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top