Can the direction of friction force be opposite to the direction of motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrk613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modifying the formula F=ma to incorporate static or kinetic friction coefficients. The friction force opposes the motion of the contact point of an object, with its magnitude calculated as F = mu * N, where mu is the coefficient of friction and N is the normal force. In specific cases, such as a rolling wheel, the direction of the friction force can align with the direction of motion. This highlights that friction acts on the contact point rather than the object as a whole. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate force analysis in physics.
jrk613
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how to modify F=ma and put in either static or kinetic friction coefficient. I assume it's something like F-(friction coef) but I'm just not sure, any ideas or websites someone can direct me to? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jrk613 said:
I was wondering how to modify F=ma and put in either static or kinetic friction coefficient. I assume it's something like F-(friction coef) but I'm just not sure, any ideas or websites someone can direct me to? thanks

When you draw the free body diagram, you put in a friction force vector as one of the force vectors acting on the object. The direction of the friction force vector is to oppose motion of the object (whether static or kinetic friction), and the magnitude is generally F = mu * N, where mu is the coefficient of friction, and N is the normal force between the object and whatever it is rubbing on. N is often just the weight of the object, for example.
 
berkeman said:
The direction of the friction force vector is to oppose motion of the object (whether static or kinetic friction)
Not the object as a whole. Only the motion of the contact point. For the FBD of a rolling wheel or an entire car for example, friction can turn out to be in the direction of motion.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top