Can the Doppler Formula be Used for an Accelerated Sound Source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gandharva_23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doppler Formula
gandharva_23
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Can i use the doppler formula ( i.e f = f(0){(v(+/-)v(0))/(v(+/-)v(s))}) when the source is accelerated taking v as the speed of sound in air v(o) the speed of the observer and v(s) the speed of source at the time the sound wave is generated . I tried deriving this formula but came across some really difficult mathematics in case of an accelerated source ... would be really thankful if someone can derive that formula for an accelerated source or atleast tell whether its applicable or not (in case of an accelerated source ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gandharva_23 said:
Can i use the doppler formula ( i.e f = f(0){(v(+/-)v(0))/(v(+/-)v(s))}) when the source is accelerated taking v as the speed of sound in air v(o) the speed of the observer and v(s) the speed of source at the time the sound wave is generated .
Yes, the acceleration doesn't affect that formula.
 
can you prove that ?
 
Underlying that doppler formula is an analysis of the time-intervals between successive wavefronts... transmitted by the source and received by the receiver. When the relative velocity is not constant, the formula almost certainly does not strictly apply... but may approximately apply in an appropriate limit.
 
Under what all conditions will it apply ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top