Can the equations for two retarded potentials satisfy the Lorenz condition?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kkabi_seo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Lorenz
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 7K views
kkabi_seo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png


upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png
I wonder these equations can satisfy the Lorenz condition??

I mean.. how above equations can satisfy the divergence A + 1/c^2 dϕ/dt =0.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png
    upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png
    1 KB · Views: 799
  • upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png
    upload_2018-12-21_0-58-33.png
    1 KB · Views: 819
on Phys.org
I think the direct equation you want is div(curl(V))=0; for instance, https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...nation-for-operatornamediv-operatornamecurl-f
Now reasoning backward's from div(V)= 0 to integration and proving the conditions for V=curl(R) escapes me right now. Although I think that moving to Tensors and/or differential forms, might work. I also think that this is equivalent to conditions on ρ(x,t), J(x,t); i.e a space-time current/flow flow. If nobody else answers I will look it up.
Old with memory even poorer than when I was younger :)
Ray
 
The Lorenz condition is used in the derivation of the two retarded potentials so they must satisfy it.
Proving that it does, starting with those integrals, is tricky because it is difficult to differentiate the retarded time.