Can the Gauss Law for Gravitation be used to prove the Shell Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SHISHKABOB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that an object inside a uniformly dense, spherically symmetric shell experiences no gravitational force from the shell's mass. The user attempts to apply Gauss's Law for Gravitation to simplify the calculations, suggesting that averaging the distances and angles could streamline the process. They express uncertainty about their approach but believe it aligns with the principles of uniform density. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the implications of Gauss's Law in this context. Ultimately, the user seeks clarity on whether their method is valid for proving the Shell Theorem.
SHISHKABOB
Messages
539
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that an object within a spherically symmetric shell with uniform density will feel no gravitational force due to the mass of the shell. Let the density of the shell be ρ, the mass of the object be m, the radii to the inner and outer surfaces be r1 and r2 respectively, and let the mass of the shell be M.

Homework Equations


F = GmM/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



so far I've drawn my setup. I tried to emulate the wikipedia article's drawing so that now I have two shells basically. I'm not exactly sure where I should go from here.

I have:

dFR = GmdM/(s^{2}_{1})cos(\varphi_{1}) + GmdM/(s^{2}_{2})cos(\varphi_{2})

but... can't I just take the distance and angle right in the middle of those two? I'll call them x and \alpha

so that I have

dFR = GmdM/(x^{2})cos(\alpha)

where x = (s1 + s2)/2

and \alpha = (\varphi_{1} + \varphi_{2})/2

?

if so that would make things a lot easier

I think that it would be okay to do that because it says that the shell has uniform density
 

Attachments

  • shell theorem.png
    shell theorem.png
    20 KB · Views: 645
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you would like to use the ' Gauss Law for Gravitation '.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top