Can the Partial Sum of a Difficult Series be Solved with Induction?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the partial sum of the series $$S=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left(\frac{2^k}{3^{2^k}+1}\right)$$, particularly for large values of \( n \). Participants explore various methods to approach the problem, including numerical evaluation of initial terms and the potential for a closed-form expression. The context includes high school mathematics and the use of induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Homework-related, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest calculating the first few terms of the series to observe patterns, noting that the partial sums converge towards \( \frac{1}{2} \).
  • Others propose that the series can be expressed in a closed form, specifically suggesting a formula of the form $$S_n = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{2^{n+1}} - 1}$$.
  • A participant mentions that the infinite sum converges to \( \frac{1}{2} \) and questions how to demonstrate this formally.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of using mathematical induction to prove the proposed formula for \( S_n \), providing a base case and an induction step.
  • Several choices for the value of the sum are presented, including options that suggest different forms of convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While there is some agreement on the convergence of the series towards \( \frac{1}{2} \), there is no consensus on the exact closed-form expression or the method of proof. Participants express differing views on the necessity of formal proofs versus numerical evaluation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the accuracy of numerical evaluations and the assumptions made in deriving the proposed closed-form expression. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps required to prove the convergence or the correctness of the proposed formula.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to high school students, educators, and anyone exploring series summation techniques, particularly in the context of mathematical induction and convergence analysis.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Hello MHB! (Wave)

A young man in high school I know has been essentially tasked with finding the following partial sum:

$$S=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left(\frac{2^k}{3^{2^k}+1}\right)$$

I honestly have no idea how to proceed, and I am hoping someone here can provide some insight. (Star)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarkFL said:
Hello MHB! (Wave)

A young man in high school I know has been essentially tasked with finding the following partial sum:

$$S=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left(\frac{2^k}{3^{2^k}+1}\right)$$

I honestly have no idea how to proceed, and I am hoping someone here can provide some insight. (Star)
Hey MarkFL,

For high school I would suggest to simply write it out:
$$S_0=\frac{2^0}{3^{2^0}+1}=\frac 14 = 0.25 \\
S_1=\frac 14 + \frac{2^1}{3^{2^1}+1}=\frac 14 + \frac 2{10} = \frac 9{20} = 0.45 \\
S_2=\frac 9{20} + \frac{2^2}{3^{2^2}+1}=\frac 9{20} + \frac{4}{82} = \frac{409}{820}\approx 0.49878 \\
S_3=\frac{409}{820} + \frac{2^3}{3^{2^3}+1} = \frac{409}{820} + \frac{8}{6561} \approx 0.4999996
$$
 
I like Serena said:
Hey MarkFL,

For high school I would suggest to simply write it out:
$$S_0=\frac{2^0}{3^{2^0}+1}=\frac 14 = 0.25 \\
S_1=\frac 14 + \frac{2^1}{3^{2^1}+1}=\frac 14 + \frac 2{10} = \frac 9{20} = 0.45 \\
S_2=\frac 9{20} + \frac{2^2}{3^{2^2}+1}=\frac 9{20} + \frac{4}{82} = \frac{409}{820}\approx 0.49878 \\
S_3=\frac{409}{820} + \frac{2^3}{3^{2^3}+1} = \frac{409}{820} + \frac{8}{6561} \approx 0.4999996
$$

The actual sum he's given is:

$$S=\sum_{k=0}^{2006}\left(\frac{2^k}{3^{2^k}+1}\right)$$

And he's given several choices for the result. I was hoping to find the general partial sum in closed form, and then answer the question that way.

W|A tells me the corresponding infinite sum is 1/2, but I don't even know how to show that. (Sweating)
 
MarkFL said:
The actual sum he's given is:

$$S=\sum_{k=0}^{2006}\left(\frac{2^k}{3^{2^k}+1}\right)$$

And he's given several choices for the result. I was hoping to find the general partial sum in closed form, and then answer the question that way.

W|A tells me the corresponding infinite sum is 1/2, but I don't even know how to show that. (Sweating)

I take it that 1/2 is one of the choices?
We can show it by simply expanding the first couple of partial sums, which show that the partial sum converges pretty quickly to 1/2.
Indeed, it's not a proof, but I don't expect that to be required on high-school level. Just to be able to get the result.

Is this about a math olympiad?
I learned a long time ago that many of the problems posed can typically be resolved by just enumerating.
 
I like Serena said:
I take it that 1/2 is one of the choices?
We can show it by simply expanding the first couple of partial sums, which show that the partial sum converges pretty quickly to 1/2.
Indeed, it's not a proof, but I don't expect that to be required on high-school level. Just to be able to get the result.

Is this about a math olympiad?
I learned a long time ago that many of the problems posed can typically be resolved by just enumerating.

Here are the choices:

A.) $$\frac{1}{2}$$

B.) $$\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2^{2006}}{3^{2^{2006}}-1}$$

C.) $$\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2^{2005}}{3^{2^{2005}}-1}$$

D.) $$\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2^{2007}}{3^{2^{2007}}-1}$$

E.) None of the above.

I'm not sure where the problem came from, but it's not for a competition, just a problem given to a high school student in a gifted program.
 
I like Serena said:
For high school I would suggest to simply write it out:
$$S_0=\frac{2^0}{3^{2^0}+1}=\frac 14 = 0.25 \\
S_1=\frac 14 + \frac{2^1}{3^{2^1}+1}=\frac 14 + \frac 2{10} = \frac 9{20} = 0.45 \\
S_2=\frac 9{20} + \frac{2^2}{3^{2^2}+1}=\frac 9{20} + \frac{4}{82} = \frac{409}{820}\approx 0.49878 \\
S_3=\frac{409}{820} + \frac{2^3}{3^{2^3}+1} = \frac{409}{820} + \frac{8}{656{\color{red}2}} \approx 0.4999996
$$
Writing those as $$S_0= \frac 14 = \frac12 - \frac14 = \frac12 - \frac28 = \frac12 - \frac{2^1}{3^{2^1} - 1}, \\
S_1= \frac 9{20} = \frac12 -\frac1{20} = \frac12 - \frac4{80} = \frac12 - \frac{2^2}{3^{2^2} - 1}, \\
S_2= \frac{409}{820} = \frac12 - \frac1{820} = \frac12 - \frac8{6560} = \frac12 - \frac{2^3}{3^{2^3} - 1},$$ it begins to look as though $$ S_n = \frac12 - \frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{2^{n+1}} - 1}.$$ That suggests option D.) as the correct answer for $S_{2006}.$

If you want something more convincing, you can use induction to prove that suggested formula for $S_n$.
 
Opalg said:
Writing those as $$S_0= \frac 14 = \frac12 - \frac14 = \frac12 - \frac28 = \frac12 - \frac{2^1}{3^{2^1} - 1}, \\
S_1= \frac 9{20} = \frac12 -\frac1{20} = \frac12 - \frac4{80} = \frac12 - \frac{2^2}{3^{2^2} - 1}, \\
S_2= \frac{409}{820} = \frac12 - \frac1{820} = \frac12 - \frac8{6560} = \frac12 - \frac{2^3}{3^{2^3} - 1},$$ it begins to look as though $$ S_n = \frac12 - \frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{2^{n+1}} - 1}.$$ That suggests option D.) as the correct answer for $S_{2006}.$

If you want something more convincing, you can use induction to prove that suggested formula for $S_n$.

Awesome work, as always Chris! (Yes)

Using your post, where the base case and induction statement have been given, then the induction step would be:

$$S_{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{2^{n+1}}-1}+\frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{2^{n+1}}+1}=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2^{n+2}}{3^{2^{n+2}}-1}$$

And this completes the proof by induction. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K