Can the Pauli principle be visualized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tsunami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pauli Principle
Tsunami
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
For years, I've taken the Pauli principle for granted, but now that I've taken a course on Subatomic Physics, I'm mystified again.

The example is given in the course of Neutron Stars. Neutron stars are burning stars that experience an incredible compression, drawing a lot of matter in a very small space. Apparently, under these conditions protons can react and become neutrons, but neutrons cannot react and become protons, because of the Pauli principle - they are simply too close together.

So, what we see here, is how the Pauli principle is behaving like some sort of 'absolute' (?) resistance : you simply can't have two quantum states with the same quantum numbers. So, the Pauli principle acts as some kind of potential energy which becomes ridiculously high at 'zero' distances in the 'quantum phase space'.

This is what I'm trying to achieve here: is it possible to visualize the Pauli principle? Can it be explained as some kind of resistance in a 'quantum space'?

Also, can someone try to explain why the Pauli principle works for protons, but not for neutrons in this example? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I visualize particles as waves in the quantum vacuum and visualize the PEP not as a force resulting from the nearness of two similar particles, but as a result of the inability of the quantum vacuum to support the existence of these similar waves concurrently. This is more natural IMO than visualizing a repulsive force between two similar particles. To put it anthropomorphically, how can a particle "know" that it is being forced into the same quantum state as a same-spin twin and resist the superposition? It's simpler to imagine that the vacuum has a carrying capacity. Naively, the "carrying capacity" is variable, based on the gravitational potential in which the local vacuum is located.
 
Right.

I'm not so sure how I'm supposed to imagine this 'gravitating potential'. Does a 'heavier' particle like the neutron (compared to the neutron) invoke a stronger gravitating potential? And how does this influence the carrying vacuum?
 
This may be an oversimplification. Proton plus electron take up more space than a neutron. Gravity forces the particles in a neutron star to occupy as little room as possible. Add a little more mass and the whole thing becomes a black hole.
 
Some knowledge of the density of states function might also help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top