Can the wave function be evaluated using the integral method?

facenian
Messages
433
Reaction score
25

Homework Statement


This problem is in Schaum's outline of quantum physics. We need to evaluate |\psi(x)|^2 for the wave function \psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-|k|/k_0}e^{ikx} dk


Homework Equations


|\psi(x)|^2=\psi(x)\psi(x)^*


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to evaluate the integral \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'e^{-(|k|+|k'|)/k_0}e^{i(k-k')x}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
facenian said:

Homework Statement


This problem is in Schaum's outline of quantum physics. We need to evaluate |\psi(x)|^2 for the wave function \psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-|k|/k_0}e^{ikx} dx
The integral should be with respect to k, not x. You can evaluate it. Give it a shot.

Homework Equations


|\psi(x)|^2=\psi(x)\psi(x)^*


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to evaluate the integral \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk'e^{-(|k|+|k'|)/k_0}e^{i(k-k')x}
 
yes it should be with respect to k not x. Can you give me same hint. Is it correct trying to evaluate it as I wrote in my attempt at a soluciont? or should I evaluate \psi(x)directly? or me be use the residue technique?
 
Last edited:
I'd just integrate it directly. There's no need to do anything fancy here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top