Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Can there be insurance for data loss due to EMP

  1. Aug 20, 2016 #1

    EnumaElish

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If an insurer were to offer a policy against data loss from a catastrophic event such as an electromagnetic pulse, the insurer would be in no position to pay when the contingency occurs, the reason being that all of his own bank account will have been wiped clean by the same EMP. Therefore I conclude that such a policy is a logical fallacy and its offer would constitute fraud. What do you think?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 20, 2016 #2

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What if his information was stored offline? It could be that only the most recent transactions would be lost. Wouldn't an EMP only effect a portion of the world, not the entire world at once?
     
  4. Aug 20, 2016 #3

    EnumaElish

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Okay, by the same token the insurer's money will have to be held either as physical assets, e.g. gold bars; or they will have to be invested in off-shore accounts. Physical assets are either illiquid or impractical (e.g. prone to theft). Off-shore accounts are aggressively targeted by the US authorities and that makes them uneconomical IMO: http://www.investopedia.com/article...implications-opening-foreign-bank-account.asp
     
  5. Aug 20, 2016 #4

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The insured is responsible to keep a copy (electronically and/or hard copy of the policy). Financial companies keeps protected backups. Electronic copies can be retained in redundant backup, and electronically stored files can be transferred to optical media, or the devices are placed in Faraday cages, or otherwise secure facilities.

    And EMP may fall under and Act of War, so one should read the exclusions in the policy.
     
  6. Aug 20, 2016 #5

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    When i lived in Florida Keys my homeowner's insurance company filed bankruptcy Friday afternoon before hurricane Andrew. Needless to say i dont trust them.

    Did you see the Frontline about insurance company abuse following Hurricane Sandy ?
    http://www.npr.org/2016/05/24/47886...urance-firms-profited-400-million-after-sandy

    So far as i know insurance won't pay for damage from an "act of war" , so i'd regard such a policy as a scam.
     
  7. Aug 21, 2016 #6

    1oldman2

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    My commercial liability policy specifically mentions nuclear war as an "all bets are off" situation.
     
  8. Aug 21, 2016 #7

    EnumaElish

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Catastrophic EMP can conceivably fall under terrorism insurance: http://www.insurancetech.com/data-a...nce-industry-five-years-later/d/d-id/1309633?

    Excerpt from the link:
    This was written in 2006. I am pessimistic that much has changed during the decade since. Are terrorism insurance documents and finances being kept in faraday cages? I very much doubt it.
     
  9. Dec 11, 2016 #8
    Why are spark-gaps very important in electromagnetic devices
     
  10. Dec 11, 2016 #9

    1oldman2

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

  11. Dec 11, 2016 #10
    A financial organisation could face total loss of data for more mundane reasons than EMP if they relied on keeping everything on one system.
    Major fire or flooding for instance.
    The fact is they don't rely on one system, they keep multiple backups of everything and the backups are stored in different physical locations.
     
  12. Dec 19, 2016 #11
    I BELIEVE Even if the bank loses your digital money they HAVE to pay you back. All major forms of money are simply a guarantee that that amount of gold physically exists somewhere, but this has little to do with the question lol.
    \
    Banks are losing millions due to cyber criminals and are keeping it quiet. Yes this is different but they have to settle! EMP or cyber crime.

    Also someone told me banks could keep hardcopies of all accounts but I dont believe them, maybe for large customers like big firms.

    Of course such a large insurance firm would have a legal team and an accounting structure/staff that ensures the bank does not get away scot free. insurance firms tend to have physical liquid assets too which they can quickly sell off in such emergencies.\

    So, I have to go print out my bank statements soon...:nb) otherwise what evidence do I have that I had x amount of money in the bank if and when the EMP hits...:sorry:
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
  13. Dec 19, 2016 #12

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    ?? i think 99% of all money is nothing but debt.
    Your money in the bank is a debt the bank owes you. They lend out your cash several times over, creating way more debt that the borrowers owe them. They live off the interest on that larger debt owed to them. They keep just a few percent of your money on hand to cover your checks, figuring you won't want to withdraw it all at once. Look up "Fractional Reserve Banking" . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking

    and watch Michael Lewis's movie "The Big Short" , it's on Netflix and is a real eye opener because it's a true story about banks.

    I still get monthly printouts from the bank that i keep for a few years. Never signed up for e-banking, see my signature.
     
  14. Dec 19, 2016 #13

    rbelli1

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Assuming a global loss of data and telecommunications the least of everyone's worries would be cash.

    BoB
     
  15. Dec 19, 2016 #14
    "Paper Money
    In England, precious metals and coins were used almost exclusively as
    money until the middle of the seventeenth century. However, in 1640,
    Charles I appropriated £130 000 worth of gold held for merchants in the
    Tower of London. Thereafter gold and silver bullion plate were kept in the
    strong rooms of the goldsmiths. Eventually receipts for these deposits were
    accepted in exchange for goods, and so withdrawal of the actual gold and
    silver became unnecessary.
    This was the origin of the bank-note, and paper currency soon began to
    form an increasing proportion of British money. The paper from which
    notes are made is comparatively worthless. But people who receive notes
    are confident that others too will accept them. Notes possess, therefore,
    the essential characteristic of money - general acceptability. This is true
    even though, since 1931, it has not been possible in the United Kingdom to
    exchange notes for gold at the Bank of England.
    "

    Oh man...it turns out few currencies, if any, are backed by gold or metals:sorry: (from the 70s), they are backed by GDP.

    i think it is BAD most money exists and will continue to exist as abstractions on bank papers and digital spaces BUT the vast quantities of money are not something anyone wants.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Can there be insurance for data loss due to EMP
  1. Pet insurance question (Replies: 5)

Loading...