Can two blackbody emitters combine to act like one emitter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrBloke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplifying
DrBloke
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm having a discussion about blackbody radiation on one of the other forums. I'm trying to prove that two blackbody emitters combine to act like one blackbody emitter. Unfortunately the algebra is beyond me. What I need to show is the following:

I want to show that
\frac{1}{e^{ax}-1}+\frac{1}{e^{bx}-1}

can be written as

\frac{1}{e^{cx}-1}

where c is some function of a and b. I suspect it might be a weighted average of a and b.

Can it be done? Having plotted a graph of the sum of the two functions I suspect it can since the shape of the graph is the same shape as the individual functions before they are added together.

Edit: Thinking about it it's probably more likely to be of the form

\frac{k}{e^{cx}-1}

where k is also a function of a and b. But I can't show that either. Putting things over a common denominator didn't help.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The graphs may look "nearly" the same shape, but they are different.

If
y = 1 / ( e^ax - 1)
1/y = e^ax + 1
1/y - 1 = e^ax
ax = log(1/y + 1)

So the graph of log (1/y +1) against x is a strainght line.

Take say a = 1, b = 0.5, and x from 0.1 to 2.

Plot the corrsponding graph for the sum of the two functions, and it is close to a strainght line but not exactly straight.
 
Thanks AlephZero that helped a lot and saved me a lot of time I might have wasted trying to prove it was.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top