Can Varying the Gravitational Constant Mimic General Relativity's Effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Gravity
John15
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hope this is the right forum as I am having a little trouble finding my around the site.
Just a thought and I don't know if it makes sense but could the results on gravitation in GR be duplicated using a variable gravity constant in Newtonian. I was thinking of using something like density to vary the GC.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no variation of Newtonian gravity that reproduces GR. There have been attempts made, like introducing propagation delay, varying G etc.

Newtonian gravity is rather like GR without spatial curvature, where only the time-curvature is operating. The weak field limit of GR approximates Newtonian gravity very closely, so it's more a case of how Newtonian gravity comes from GR rather than the other way around.
 
Can I assume that includes giving all different density/velocity/masses and the space inbetween differing g constants
 
John15 said:
Can I assume that includes giving all different density/velocity/masses and the space inbetween differing g constants

I don't have enough knowledge about the topic to answer that, even if I understood it.:wink:
 
John15 said:
Hope this is the right forum as I am having a little trouble finding my around the site.
Just a thought and I don't know if it makes sense but could the results on gravitation in GR be duplicated using a variable gravity constant in Newtonian. I was thinking of using something like density to vary the GC.
No. That would be a scalar field and AFAIK, the GR field cannot even in principle be represented as a scalar field except in the case of static spacetimes.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top