Can We Detect Moons Around Earth-Sized Exoplanets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 888eddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exoplanets Moons
AI Thread Summary
Detecting moons around Earth-sized exoplanets presents significant technological challenges, as current methods like radial velocity and transit are not effective for this purpose. The unique characteristics of Earth's moon, including its size and stable orbit, complicate the search for similar systems. Advanced techniques such as nulling interferometry are being developed to help cancel out starlight and directly image exoplanets, which could enable atmospheric analysis for signs of life. The likelihood of finding a planet with all the desired parameters requires an extensive search and advancements in detection technology. Overall, while exciting prospects exist, substantial progress is still needed to achieve these goals.
888eddy
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
how far are we from detecting a moon around an Earth sized planet in another star system?

i read an article recently (http://www.newscientist.com/article...e-sun-and-moon-the-same-size-in-the-sky.html") about how the moon being so close to Earth wasn't, or doesn't appear to be, a very likely event. since there was a low probability of our planet having our moon it seems it was actually important for life to form here in the first place (tides, etc...).

it got me wondering how far technology has to develop in order to find a planet the same size of earth, in the same type of orbit, around an identical star to the sun, with a moon the same size of Earth's on the same type of orbit?

do we need to detect the moon? what comes first, detecting wavelengths of light reflected from the surface of the planet, or detecting a planets wobble due to its moon? if we could detect light from the planets surface would we be able to detect any plant life etc?

what about detecting oxygen in the atmosphere?

i can't think of anything more exciting than detecting these kind of things and am basically wondering how much we will find out, and the likelihood we will find strong evidence of extra terrestrial life, within my lifetime.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The types of detection techniques we use today, radial velocity and transit, would not be very good at revealing moons. It will likely take a new technique using new technology.
 
888eddy said:
i read an article recently (http://www.newscientist.com/article...e-sun-and-moon-the-same-size-in-the-sky.html") about how the moon being so close to Earth wasn't, or doesn't appear to be, a very likely event. since there was a low probability of our planet having our moon it seems it was actually important for life to form here in the first place (tides, etc...).

it got me wondering how far technology has to develop in order to find a planet the same size of earth, in the same type of orbit, around an identical star to the sun, with a moon the same size of Earth's on the same type of orbit?

It's true that the Earth's satellite situation is quite unique. First, the mass of the moon is very comparable to that of the Earth, and it is in an extremely stable orbit as well. (Coincidentally it covers about the same angle in the sky as the sun, too!).

If you're going to cherry pick planets in order to find one with all the parameters you described, we would need to extend our search radius by orders of magnitude probably before we found one. This alone, let alone detection techniques, would be an extreme technological undertaking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
would it be possible to use interferometry to 'see' an exoplanet?
i mean to cancel out the light of the sun i know it would be difficult especally in the visible but is it theoretically possible?
 
There are projects in development that will use nulling interferometry to cancel out a star's own light and hopefully be able to image planets directly. This would allow us to analyse the atmospheres of such planets for gasses that indicate signs of life.

See (for example):

http://www.darwin.rl.ac.uk/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sweet i hope they can do it :)
and I'm glad it wasn't a silly idea!
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top