Can We Engineer Our Own Stars to Prevent the Heat Death of the Universe?

AI Thread Summary
Engineering stars to prevent the universe's heat death is theoretically intriguing but fundamentally flawed due to the laws of thermodynamics. The second law states that entropy in a closed system always increases, meaning any attempt to create stars would not extend the universe's lifespan. Gathering energy and mass to form a star would require more energy than the star could produce, making it an inefficient endeavor. Ultimately, such efforts would accelerate the conversion of useful energy into waste rather than prolonging cosmic existence. The discussion highlights the limitations imposed by thermodynamic principles on the feasibility of creating artificial stars.
edwardauron
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Assuming the law of thermodynamics holds true throughout the entirety of the universe, is it theoretically possible to engineer our own stars and solar systems, and would doing so prevent the proposed eventual "Dark Age" of the universe? We understand how stars are formed, so what's stopping us from creating our own at some point in the future? (Besides the blatantly obvious)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
edwardauron said:
Assuming the law of thermodynamics holds true throughout the entirety of the universe, is it theoretically possible to engineer our own stars and solar systems, and would doing so prevent the proposed eventual "Dark Age" of the universe? We understand how stars are formed, so what's stopping us from creating our own at some point in the future? (Besides the blatantly obvious)
You could gather energy and mass from one place, and put it in another place, but you'd still have the same amount of both. This would not lengthen the lifetime of - or change the fate of - the universe.Actually your efforts would hasten the process of turning useful energy into waste energy.

Second law of thermodynamics: In a natural thermodynamic process, the sum of the entropies of the interacting thermodynamic systems increases. Equivalently,perpetual motion machines of the second kind are impossible.
 
Or another way of putting it, is that you would have to expend more energy scavenging and assembling enough hydrogen to make a star, than your star would be able to usefully emit once you got fusion going.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top