Can we get caught by surprise by an asteroid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bostonnew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid
AI Thread Summary
Asteroids can potentially catch us by surprise, but large ones capable of causing extinction events are unlikely to go undetected due to existing monitoring efforts. Long-period comets pose a greater risk as they can approach Earth from any direction, making them harder to track. While the possibility of a significant asteroid impact exists, the odds of such an event occurring imminently are low. Current technology is insufficient for effectively deflecting or destroying large asteroids, and nuclear options may not be viable due to the risk of fragmentation. Overall, while we can be surprised by smaller asteroids, the threat of a catastrophic impact remains minimal in the near term.
bostonnew
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Or will we always find them with our telescopes well before they hit us?

Could something wipe us out tomorrow?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
We can get caught by surprise by an asteroid, but it's unlikely that one big enough to wipe us out will surprise us. Most of those have already been found, I believe.

However, the same can't be said about comets. Long period comets can come from any direction, and some can be big enough to do some serious damage.
 
Jack21222 said:
Long period comets can come from any direction...
Nope. They all come from the same direction.

Up.

:biggrin:
 
Jack21222 said:
We can get caught by surprise by an asteroid, but it's unlikely that one big enough to wipe us out will surprise us. Most of those have already been found, I believe.

I agree w/ you, but "unlikely" is not impossible, and part of the problem is that IF a big one pops up on everybody's radar screens tomorrow, and it is very big and it is going to hit us in, say, a year, do you think we could DO anything about it? Given a few years and an Apollo-project size commitment, we might be able to, but I wouldn't want to have to count on it.
 
You guyz heard that there's an asteroid fly by day after tomorrow, right? 2005 YU55. I guess that's what's prompted the OP's question.
 
phinds said:
I agree w/ you, but "unlikely" is not impossible, and part of the problem is that IF a big one pops up on everybody's radar screens tomorrow, and it is very big and it is going to hit us in, say, a year, do you think we could DO anything about it? Given a few years and an Apollo-project size commitment, we might be able to, but I wouldn't want to have to count on it.

Any idea what it would take to deflect or destroy an object of sufficient size to threaten Earth?
 
Drakkith said:
Any idea what it would take to deflect or destroy an object of sufficient size to threaten Earth?

I think that's part of the problem. We DON'T know.

I HAVE read studies that show that just detonating a nuclear bomb on it isn't likely to do the trick if it's really big. I DOES seem that if we could put some kind of propulsive system on it LONG before it was due to hit us that we could drive it off course enought to miss
 
Massive object a year from colliding with earth?? The prognosis is unfavorable. 10 years, maybe. 1 year, very bad.
 
To answer the OP's 3 part question
1) Yes we can be surprised by an asteroid
2) no, we will not always find them with our telescopes before they hit us
3) no, the odds of being wiped out tomorrow are so low that no one would take that bet.

We are actually hit quite often. I think estimates have somewhere between 40k to 80k tons of material falling to the Earth in a year. Most of it from dust sized particles.

For extinction event sized rocks it's far less frequent. And while we may be surprised, generally if something that large was heading to us there is a good probability that it'd be spotted.

What it would take to deflect or destroy the object? That would really depends on size, shape, composition, density, angle of attack, time to impact. If you can throw enough mass off the rock you can alter its course. The farther out the greater the course deviation.

We don't have anything that can do that today. Folks always talk "nukes". But our nuclear arsenal is designed to be a ballistic system and isn't suitable for "aiming into space". It would unlikely to be effective if that were the case at any rate.
 
  • #10
Chronos said:
Massive object a year from colliding with earth?? The prognosis is unfavorable. 10 years, maybe. 1 year, very bad.

If Bruce Willis is still alive during that time, I think 1 year would be more than enough...

How reflective are typical asteroids? Is it probable that there is a very very dark astroid that is huge, so we wouldn't see it until it is too late?
 
  • #12
phinds said:
I think that's part of the problem. We DON'T know.

I think we do know. If you put delta V into an asteroid, then you can calculate the orbital effects.

I HAVE read studies that show that just detonating a nuclear bomb on it isn't likely to do the trick if it's really big.

If it's big enough then you are doomed. But if it's medium sized then it gets interesting.

A quick calculation shows that you aren't going to destroy the asteroid. The Earth is tiny so that you just have to nudge it so that it misses. One thing that would be a big "oopps" is it would be a really bad thing if the asteroid was going to miss the Earth and you nudged it so that it hits.

I DOES seem that if we could put some kind of propulsive system on it LONG before it was due to hit us that we could drive it off course enought to miss

You could just paint half the asteroid so that solar radiation will nudge it.
 
  • #13
Many asteroids are nothing more than rubble piles, as evidenced by their low density. Attempting to deflect them with a nuclear explosion would likely do no more than fragment them so that the Earth was subject to multiple large impacts rather than one very large impact.
 
  • #14
Ophiolite said:
Many asteroids are nothing more than rubble piles, as evidenced by their low density. Attempting to deflect them with a nuclear explosion would likely do no more than fragment them so that the Earth was subject to multiple large impacts rather than one very large impact.
Unless the explosion dispersed the mass of the asteroid to the extent that a significant amount of it missed the Earth altogether.

Additionally, even if it didn't, the same mass broken up into smaller chunks gives us a better chance of having much of it burn up in the atmo before causing surface damage.
 
Back
Top