Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Can we get FLRW another way?

  1. Jan 23, 2013 #1

    anorlunda

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Suppose we postulate that instead of the universe expanding, the speed of light was decreasing? Now we try to derive the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric from Newtonian conservation of energy. Would we get the same result?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 23, 2013 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    You would need some way to contract gravitationally bound objects at the same time, otherwise we could measure this slowed speed of light.
    And if you do that, you just redefine the length of a meter. This is possible, of course, but you get nothing new. I don't see how you plan to use Newtonian conservation of energy.
     
  4. Jan 23, 2013 #3

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Variable speed of light theories are plagued by a number of issues. It does not play well with any number of theories that incorporate c in their formulation - like the nuclear fine structure constant. It unavoidably breaks Lorentz, diffeomorphism and time translational invariance, implying a violation of energy conservation. And plays strangely with gravity, suggesting both gravity and its propogation speed must also vary to avoid conflicts with well established observational evidence. It's not that such a thing is not possible, but, would have far reaching consequences for GR and much of physics.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Can we get FLRW another way?
  1. FLRW metric (Replies: 3)

Loading...