Can We Physically Detect Radio Waves?

AI Thread Summary
Radio waves are typically undetectable by the human body due to their low energy levels, which are insufficient to excite electrons. Detection occurs through metallic antennas, as humans lack organs that can mimic this function. At high power levels, radio waves can cause heating effects, which some RF engineers have experienced near transmitters. While human nerves respond electrically, their responses to radio frequencies are slow, though some individuals have reported hearing music from high levels of medium frequency transmissions due to metallic dental fillings. The discussion highlights the limitations of human sensory detection of radio waves compared to other forms of electromagnetic radiation.
LogicalAcid
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Because they don't have enough energy to be noticed? If I understand right, they are not energized enough to ecxite electrons?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Radio waves are detected by metallic antennas. We don't have any organs that mimic this.
 
At high enough power levels you would detect their heating effect
 
NobodySpecial said:
At high enough power levels you would detect their heating effect

I know I'm supposed to be serious and stuff, but I laughed so hard when you said power levels.
 
NobodySpecial said:
At high enough power levels you would detect their heating effect

Yes. Plenty of 'elderly' RF engineers talk of feeling their legs get warm in situations of high levels of RF power, around transmitters. Health and Safety regs prevent us getting into such situations these days! The heating is due to molecular vibrations which is more of a direct heating effect than the generation of electrical currents and I guess there will also be movement of ions through body fliuids.

As for detecting RF directly, our nerves, although working 'electrically' have very slow responses. However, people have been known to detect radio transmissions (they hear music) due to the rectifying effect of metallic dental fillings in high levels of medium frequency radio transmissions. I guess that would be the nearest thing to direct experience of RF.

Our eyes respond to em (light) by a photo chemical process - doesn't fit the original question - and high energy radiations (UV, X and gamma) interact with our chemistry too, causing damage which we don't feel at the time.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top