Can we tell apart antimatter from matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter technobot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Matter
AI Thread Summary
Antimatter can theoretically be detected using telescopic techniques similar to those for matter, but distinguishing between the two remains challenging. When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate, releasing significant energy, which is why the universe appears to contain little antimatter. The chirality of antiparticles differs from their matter counterparts, affecting their interactions under the weak force, though these differences are subtle and observable only in precision tests. Additionally, matter and antimatter have opposite charges within their atomic structures, with matter's nucleus being positively charged and antimatter's negatively charged. Overall, while there are fundamental differences, direct observation to differentiate antimatter from matter is not currently feasible.
technobot
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello, assuming we can detect antimatter with some telescopic technique just like we can detect matter, is there any way to tell them apart? How would this be done?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Anti-matter would behave exactly like regular matter until the two met. We deduce there is very little anti-matter in the universe because we do not observe such collisions, which would be hugely energetic.
 
Chronos said:
Anti-matter would behave exactly like regular matter until the two met. We deduce there is very little anti-matter in the universe because we do not observe such collisions, which would be hugely energetic.

That's not quite true. Because the chirality of an anti-particle is the opposite of its matter equivalent, its interaction under the weak force is slightly different. While the strength of the interaction is unchanged, any angular dependances of weak interactions will be reversed. This, however, can really only be seen in precision tests. So, there is nothing we could directly observe that would tell us that we're looking at antimatter.
 
Also antimatter and matter have reverse polarity inside the atoms. In matter's nucleus the charge is positive due to the proton, but the antimatter's nucleus is opposite because the nucleus is negatively charged. The electron is negative and the positron is positive.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top