B Can We Use Space/Time Fabric to See the Past?

mgsullivan24
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Is the space/time fabric analogy portrayed in movies and on YouTube consistent with actual physics and if so…
Common these days is explaining worm holes and the space and time correlation as a fabric which could allow for the fabric to be manipulated in a way that would allow for time travel. The way I’ve understood the concept is that you could fold the fabric to touch two different areas together and move between them which could allow you to revisit earth at a different place in time. Is that actually consistent with real physics?

If so, why don't we see earth and other objects in the places they were at during that time? Why can’t we look back to where earth was a year ago and see it existing at that moment in time?

Im sure I'm not even asking the question correctly but can anyone help me out here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mgsullivan24 said:
Is the space/time fabric analogy portrayed in movies and on YouTube consistent with actual physics
It's not precise enough to be either consistent or inconsistent with actual physics. It's just an analogy and doesn't really help you to make predictions.

mgsullivan24 said:
why don't we see earth and other objects in the places they were at during that time?
Um, because there aren't any wormholes near Earth?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and FactChecker
PeterDonis said:
It's not precise enough to be either consistent or inconsistent with actual physics. It's just an analogy and doesn't really help you to make predictions.


Um, because there aren't any wormholes near Earth?

A wormhole would be required to see only 1 year back? Ok what about a month? At some point isn’t a telescope essentially acting as a “wormhole”?
I guess I’m way way off on my very limited understanding of space and time.
 
mgsullivan24 said:
A wormhole would be required to see only 1 year back?
A wormhole is what you were asking about.

mgsullivan24 said:
At some point isn’t a telescope essentially acting as a “wormhole”?
You can't look at Earth with a telescope that's on Earth. With a telescope on Earth you can see distant objects as they were one light travel time ago; for example, you can see objects one light year away as they were one year ago. You can't change that; you can't adjust your telescope to see, say, Alpha Centauri as it was 2 years ago, or 6 years ago for that matter, instead of 4.3 years ago.
 
mgsullivan24 said:
A wormhole would be required to see only 1 year back? Ok what about a month? At some point isn’t a telescope essentially acting as a “wormhole”?
I guess I’m way way off on my very limited understanding of space and time.
You always see things as they were in the past because of the finite speed of light. Even if you look at yourself in the bathroom mirror your reflection is how you were a couple of nanoseconds ago, although on that timescale it's unnoticeable to humans. But this doesn't really have much to do with models of spacetime, it's a fact of life if you don't have some form of radiation that moves at infinite speed. Your information is always out of date. This is how instruments like the James Webb telescope "see back in time" - they can just see things further away, so they see light that was emitted a long time ago. You could only see our galaxy as it was a million years ago if someone had helpfully built a giant mirror half a million light years away half a million years ago.

Wormholes can, possibly, permit time travel in the "go back and shake hands with your younger self" sense. But such solutions to the equations tend to require something impossible like negative mass matter, so they're probably just a mathematical curiosity.
 
What is different about space? Why can't I use binoculars to look at the hawk that was in my backyard yesterday?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top