Can you beleive in both God and the Devil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the belief in God and the Devil, exploring whether one can exist without the other. Some participants argue that the Devil represents a state of mind rather than a literal being, while others question how Christians can deny the Devil's existence when both figures are integral to the faith. The conversation also touches on the nature of good and evil, suggesting that evil may stem from ignorance rather than being an inherent trait of a divine being. Additionally, there are views that challenge the binary perception of good versus evil, proposing that both concepts may coexist within a broader understanding of divinity. Ultimately, the dialogue reflects diverse interpretations of religious beliefs and the complexities of morality.
Andy
Messages
73
Reaction score
14
Can you believe in God and not believe in the Devil and vice versa?

I personnaly don't believe in either but my old religous education teacher told me that she believed in God but she doesn't believe in the Devil because nothing can be pure evil. so to all of the people that believe in God do you believe in the Devil and if you believe in the Devil do you believe in God?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats an interesting question. Alot of christians such as your teacher you refer to simply choose to ignore the devil's claimed existence as to make there beliefs a little bit prettier.

But really, seems for everything in existence, there is an exact opposite. Just as you have day, you have night in contrast. God, being depicted as the "All Good" and devil being described as "All Evil" are the same thing.

Now lots of people also believe that the devil is not an actual being, but a state of mind so to speak. That when you live in sin, you are working with/for the devil.

Really though, I do not understand why a person who believe in christianity would deny the existence of the devil. There is just as much reason provided to believe he exists as either an actual being, or as I desribed above, as there is provided for god and jesus's claim to fame.
 
Only fundamentalists see things as either/or, black/white, total good/total evil these days. It seems to me, standing on the outside of christianity looking in, that people can make of it what they want. I know christians who believe in a literal heaven and no hell; I know those who believe in a literal both; I know those who see heaven as being a state of knowing god and hell being the absence of a relationship with god. There are christians who see it all as metaphor and myth and there are others who take it literally.

People are neither all good or all bad (whatever that might mean), so why should they end up in one of two places, one of which is totally good and perfect and the other is eternal damnation?

If you take the fundamentalist view that only those who accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior can get into heaven, then the rest of us are damned. It's a load of nonsense really and I wouldn't take it too seriously or literally.
 
If god created everything,does'nt stand to reason that if there is a devil,that lucifer the 1st angle tried to take over heaven by turning the other angles on his side against god,that when god cast him down with the other angles that,god only let's satan believe he has power over man,making men do his bidding,by doing evil in his name,that its god doing all the evil to man,only to punish satan by deluding him with the illusion of power,but god does really give it to him.so when jesus comes back!hehehe,god free man of gods punishment on them when the battle between good and evil takes place on Earth between satan and jesus,that satan becomes aware that god fooled him,them destroys evil forever on Earth as the bible promises!
 
All interesting posts but i was hoping to get a reply from someone who only beleives in one and not the other. Noticed something quite amusing recently, some people walk around with upside down crosses on their shirts and and necklaces thinking that its an anti-religous sign even though the upside down cross is a sign of Saint Peter. lol
 
Originally posted by Andy
Can you believe in God and not believe in the Devil and vice versa?

I personnaly don't believe in either but my old religous education teacher told me that she believed in God but she doesn't believe in the Devil because nothing can be pure evil. so to all of the people that believe in God do you believe in the Devil and if you believe in the Devil do you believe in God?
Of course, one may believe anything at all that one wishes. The only Devil I know of is thought to actually be God by many people. Your teacher believed that nothing could be pure evil but did she have any problems believing something could be pure good? Hmmm...
 
Nah she insisted that God was pure good but she couldn't believe in the devil because nothing can be pure evil. when we (we being my and my mates) tried starting a class discussion about this we where just told to shut up and that's as far as it went, she was one of those teachers that couldn't stand anyone argueing a point against her point.
 
I suspected she might have had that view. Do you see how her mind was able to function logically with respect to the Devil but not with respect to God? Many people suffer from this 'condition'. She wants to believe what she wants to believe and that is all there is to it. I wonder how a god so pure and good could create something even slightly tarnished.
 
The way that i think of God is that he is a superior being but with the same thought procceses as us humans but he has a lot more intellect and one day he got so bored that he decided to create us(humans) and he is having bets with his mates (other superior beings) about how long it will take for us humans to destroy ourselves.

And for megashawns point if the devil is just a state of mind maybe god is also just a state of mind?
 
  • #10
If evil exist in its pure state,it is only because god is perfect in design.imagine a universe where we live just like we do now,but you never thought about want would happen if you hit someone in the head with a baseball bat.and you did'nt understand what would happen,and two you wouldn't understand why you'd what to,because all things in the universe are there to be done at any given time and it would be pretty weird if you never did,so well someone had to try,and someone had to die because of it.so we learned how to kill.them some liked it and some hated it.this doesn't mean evil is something that just is,its something people chose to do,like predetermination.some are born gay,some never thought of it until they were 35,and where divorced,and hated women,the tried it and never came back.you just never know what will make you like something until your exposed to it.because I am sure you've never thought of something,then when you hear it or someone told you or you saw it,it just hits you all of a sudden that you like it,this is how you find you likes and dislikes in the world.so some people are prone to it and try not to do it because they know its wrong,but can't help themself,or some just do it because lifes f-cked up and they hate everything and want to get back at the world,so they hurt people because they think it will make them feel better watching someone else suffer.some things push people over when they were stable there whole life.are they evil,or is it pychologically sound in saying that it was they only way of dealling with it and they made a bad choice.i don't this that's evil,people who like killing because they like to kill is evil,people who want to get back at the world for just being alive hate life so much it gives them a reason to become evil,can you say these people were born evil or did life make them become evil,its hard to say!
 
  • #11
i don't believe anything but god exists actually, with evil or "devils" simply being a product of extreeme confusion and misunderstanding of the true nature of god.
 
  • #12
Gods and devils have never been shown to exist - why believe in either one?
 
  • #13
Just because something hasnt been proven doesn't mean it doesn't exist. This is why religion is only a believe or faith, because it can't be proven but many people believe in it. As i have said before in this topic i don't believe in the Christian God but i would be foolish to rule out the possiblity of a superior being, being the person that created us.
 
  • #14
The devil wasn't always thought of as evil. At one point, he was just the tempter. He was actually considered an angel whose job was to test people. At some point, beliefs changed, and the whole idea of hell and the evil god-like being developed.

Njorl
 
  • #15
Well, I remember that one of the premise of Wicca was that to think it it made it real. In other words, if you really believe the Christian god and devil exists, then they do. And honestly, who am I or anyone to tell you different. Also, the more people who believe X being exist, the more powerfull that being becomes.

Now, the only way I know of that a thing can exist just because I think it does is in the imaginary world. If me, and say 100,000 other people all think that X being exists, then obviously that beings influence will be greater on Earth then of a group of only 10,000. Simpy because men turn imagination into reality in these matters.
 
  • #16
God = all things = "God is devil, too".
When you contemplate 'God', sooner-or-later you have to ask yourself why 'God' would be good, instead of bad. The answer is obvious: God chooses to be good to all things that are 'himself' (everything). After-all, given the power of God which being wouldn't choose to be good to itself? To give itself its heart's desires?
But a God cannot be a God unless it embraces all things. For what-price a God without the power to effect a specific idea or object?
Therefore, the 'idea' of bad must be known to God. God must be aware of what 'evil' is, or what ~power~ can he have over it?
Hence, any 'evil' which exists is merely an out-pouring of God itself.
 
  • #17
Not to detract from what you're saying here ...

Evil is the misappropriation of God's power which, can only be brought about by one thing, "ignorance." And yet since God is all knowing, then evil cannot be not perceived as such. On the other hand when God created man, who in and of himself is nothing but ignorant, then that generates a void, which necessitates the need for an antithesis, "the Devil."
 
  • #18
Interesting thoughts LG and Iacchus32,
I do not believe that anything evil, bad, etc. could come from a being perfectly pure. It makes sense to me that, accepting the existence of god, from god all things must emanate, and this would have to include the so called 'evil', 'bad', ‘Devil’, etc.
But like Iacchus32 recognized, we may be diverting the topic.

N_Quire,
Here’s a thought; only the Devil exists, not a benevolent and loving God. An attempt to deceive mankind into believing he may ‘go to heaven’ or live ‘happily ever after’ is the work of this sadistic fiend. In the end the Devil laughs loudly into the faces of the believers as he explains they have been victims of his cruel joke and orders everyone ‘into the pit’ Haha.

Could that explain some of the workings of this world?
 
  • #19
Originally posted by Iacchus32
Evil is the misappropriation of God's power which, can only be brought about by one thing, "ignorance."
Agreed.
And yet since God is all knowing, then evil cannot be not perceived as such. On the other hand when God created man, who in and of himself is nothing but ignorant, then that generates a void, which necessitates the need for an antithesis, "the Devil." [/B]
I see man as a finite aspect of God. Thus, any apparent evil which emanates from man can be viewed as an expression of a potential-attribute which exists within God itself. As you said, this potential is exhibited in relation to our ignorance. Yet God "the whole" is ignorant of nothing. God chooses 'good'. Yet, as we see in mankind, God can be bad given specific circumstances which allow for 'ignorance'.
If you believe in 'God' then you have no choice than to believe in 'evil' as an aspect/potential of that God. "The devil" is not a separate entity to God. The devil is God's own ignorant expression of life.
 
  • #20
If God and the Devil aren't separate entities then they must be the same in which case does that mean that God is just as prone to impure thoughts as any human being is? and if yes then is that where the so called devil comes from? I suppose what i am asking more specifically is, is the devil just the impure thoughts of God?
 
  • #21
Originally posted by Andy
If God and the Devil aren't separate entities then they must be the same in which case does that mean that God is just as prone to impure thoughts as any human being is?
I would say that God is only prone to 'impure thoughts', if God is ignorant to his wholeness.
and if yes then is that where the so called devil comes from?
I would say that the devil is God living in ignorance. It's a different state-of-being, rather than another entity.
I suppose what i am asking more specifically is, is the devil just the impure thoughts of God?
I would say 'ignorant'... not 'impure'.
 
  • #22
Thats sort of what i was getting at I got lost in what i was trying to say though.
 
  • #23
What we deem as evil, God deems necessary for free will. So in this respect evil does not exist. And yet evil is something that we all experience in our lives, and to us it's very real. And to us the Devil is very real as well.

And I attest, that one only need look in the mirror to discover who the Devil really is ... And just as with the fall from the Garden of Eden, where man has separated himself from God, then God and the Devil have become two separate entities.

Whereas when considering the possibility of an after life, then the Devil is man gone to Hell, plain and simple.
 
  • #24
Greetings !
Originally posted by Andy
...do you believe in the Devil and if you believe in
the Devil do you believe in God?
Sure...
As long as you believe in pink ellephants that
can fly, eternal hamburgers, coke, Pamela A. and
the American way...

Sorry folks, I just couldn't help it... :smile:

I'll let you get back to your religion forum now...:wink:

Live long and prosper.
 
  • #25
And to us the Devil is very real as well.

And you have met him then I take it? Bet you left your polaroid at home didn't ya?

And don't give me that look in the mirror bs. Going by what the bible tells us, man was created in gods image. When we look in the mirror, we see an image of ourselves. What you said also implies that God is the devil.
 
  • #26
What you say? There's no spirits around here except in bottles? Ha ha ha ha! ...
 
  • #27
And you have met him then I take it? Bet you left your polaroid at home didn't ya?

And don't give me that look in the mirror bs. Going by what the bible tells us, man was created in gods image. When we look in the mirror, we see an image of ourselves. What you said also implies that God is the devil.
Do you believe that evil exists? Do you believe its inherent with our nature? If this is true then why can't you extend it to say man is the Devil? It sounds plausible to me. While I admit that I can look within myself (in the mirror if you will) and acknowledge the inherent evil that's there? Are you capable of doing this?

And neither did I imply God was the Devil, on the contrary! (as per what I just said). While I suspect you didn't take the time to read my first post, which reads as follows:

Evil is the misappropriation of God's power which, can only be brought about by one thing, "ignorance." And yet since God is all knowing, then evil cannot be perceived as such. On the other hand when God created man, who in and of himself is nothing but ignorant, then that generates a void, which necessitates the need for an antithesis, "the Devil."
Well perhaps I could modify this a little bit, to say the Devil is "generated" through man's perception of his falling away from God.
 
  • #28
So let's assume that; God created man in his own image, Man =The Devil how ironic that would be!
 
  • #29
Originally posted by Andy
So let's assume that; God created man in his own image, Man =The Devil how ironic that would be!
This I believe is in reference to man's appearance "before the fall." And, while it may not be so readily apparent in the "physical sense," if a man chooses the life of evil, his soul or spirit will be endowed with these qualities when he passes on.

It's all predicated upon choice though, and the spirit reflects that choice.

Well perhaps I could modify this a little bit, to say the Devil is "generated" through man's perception of his falling away from God.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Originally posted by Andy
So let's assume that; God created man in his own image, Man =The Devil how ironic that would be!
Originally posted by Iacchus32
This I believe is in reference to man's appearance "before the fall." And, while it may not be so readily apparent in the "physical sense," if a man chooses the life of evil, his soul or spirit will be endowed with these qualities when he passes on.

It's all predicated upon choice though, and the spirit reflects that choice.
Originally posted by Iacchus32
Well perhaps I could modify this a little bit, to say the Devil is "generated" through man's perception of his falling away from God.
I might reiterate that God allows for evil (our perception of it) in order to allow us the freedom of choice which, is why He also created Hell, because He respects that choice. It's the only way it works. So basically, and tell me this isn't similar to the way you already perceive it, we have the freedom to mess up our lives, as well as the freedom to learn from our mistakes. Of course it would nice if we could just be held accountable for our own mistakes, but unfornately we have to pay for other people's mistakes as well. Oh well live and learn! ...

"... for the Father maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust." (Matthew 5:45)
 
  • #31
I don't know what i beleive! i don't believe in God in the way that christians believe in God but i won't rule out the possibility of another superior being, living out there somewhere but I don't believe in any of the Religous faiths, although i do find Buddhism quite interesting. The only reason i started this topic was to see if i could find someone that is as narrow minded as my old Religous education teacher.
 
  • #32
Originally posted by Andy
The only reason i started this topic was to see if i could find someone that is as narrow minded as my old Religous education teacher.
Why's that? Ususally when somebody brings up the words "narrow-minded," there's usually an argument in store.
 
  • #33
I was quite surprised when i didnt get neone argueing with me but also quite glad that i created a thread that had people being serious for once!
 
  • #34
As to the original question:
Can you believe in both God and the Devil?

Certainly, the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition has it that you can, and the matter could certainly be covered in Hinduism and perhaps a lot of animism.

As to myself - not in the slightest. "The Devil" is a human symbol with no external reality. The actual evolution of it as a construct is very visible in the Bible - the word "Satan" (Shaitan) barely appears in the Old Testament, and even then, in Job, Satan is the accuser of men. But in the New Testament the whole concept means "accuser of God" and appears all over the Christian texts as a full formed figure and symbol.

"God" in itself can also be seen as an anthropomorphic metaphor – but while "Devil" is used to embody the ills of the world as the work of a malicious spirit, "God" itself refers to wider process of the universe that still mystifies and baffles. And God the Creator remains something that is wholly unquanitifiable – hence cannot be addressed by science. People such as Dawkins merely represent a form of extremism in science, and an age-old curse of disbelieving others for no better reason than they have different opinions. Which makes Dawkins a remarkable mirror of the very fundamentalists he rails against.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Originally posted by I, Brian
"The Devil" is a human symbol with no external reality. The actual evolution of it as a construct is very visible in the Bible - the word "Satan" (Shaitan) barely appears in the Old Testament, and even then, in Job, Satan is the accuser of men. But in the New Testament the whole concept means "accuser of God" and appears all over the Christian texts as a full formed figure and symbol.
Then there's the Zoroastrian Creed, by which the Judeo-Christian idea of the battle of and good and evil is originally based -- borrowed from the Persians during the "Jewish Captivity."


"God" in itself can also be seen as an anthropomorphic metaphor – but while "Devil" is used to embody the ills of the world as the work of a malicious spirit, "God" itself refers to wider process of the universe that still mystifies and baffles. And God the Creator remains something that is wholly unquanitifiable – hence cannot be addressed by science. People such as Dawkins merely represent a form of extremism in science, and an age-old curse of disbelieving others for no better reason than they have different opinions. Which makes Dawkins a remarkable mirror of the very fundamentalists he rails against.
If in fact as you say, the Devil is the creation of man, then wouldn't it be possible to say the Devil is man? Or, perhaps that aspect of him which is unredeemable? By which we conceive of the notion of "man gone to hell," and so derive the notion of an "evil spirit" or Devil?
 
  • #36
Whoa stroke of luck that i found this thread was still going, whilst lying in bed watching TV this morning, last nite can't remember which doesn't matter anyway. But some old man was saying that there was no such thing as the devil just Evil Spirits and that in the old testament evil spirits are referred to rather than the devil, but in the new testament they refer to the evil spirits as the devil.
 
  • #37
Originally posted by Andy
Whoa stroke of luck that i found this thread was still going, whilst lying in bed watching TV this morning, last nite can't remember which doesn't matter anyway. But some old man was saying that there was no such thing as the devil just Evil Spirits and that in the old testament evil spirits are referred to rather than the devil, but in the new testament they refer to the evil spirits as the devil.
Actually I had referred to this thread on http://www.comparative-religion.com/forum/index.php?board=3;action=display;threadid=64 and I guess Brian felt obliged to reply ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
I think it would be ok to believe in God and not the Devil, but not the other way around.
That's why devil worshippers make no sense to me!
They're admitting that the Devil and hell exists, but rather than aviod the torturous eternity of Hell, they make sure they get there...
 
  • #39
Would the devil worshippers not get preferential treatment in hell?
 
  • #40
The whole "devil - God" thing is interesting if you plan to bring the bible into it.

In the bible, Satan is simply translated from the hebrew and the greek as "adversary". ie. anyone who is stopping u from doing what you want to do, or who is trying to hurt and or kill you is an adversary, and hence is satin.

example. there is a case where we have 2 identical passages in the bible - where basicly david is told to go and count his fighting men. sunsequently king david thinks "fantastic i have a huge army, let's go invade our neighbours" where his army is defeated and 2/3 of them are killed. Now, in the 1st passage it said that God told david to count his men, in the second it claims that it was Satan. everything else is identical.

another example. Balam and his donkey are wondering into yonder village to deliver a message. donkey "Satan" (who is later revieled to be an angel of God) stands in the way of the path, and the donkey freaks out and jumps aside. once balam realizes the angel is there (i think it was the angel gabriel, or maybe it was the other one) he sits back and the angel says 'surely if your donkey had not shyied, i would have killed you" and tell me now, who is more of an adversary then an angel who is about to kill you?

there is no fallen angel that is satan who is causing the evil in the world. all "evil" in the bible is sunbective to the story teller. as far as the 'good and evil' and God debate is concered, then evil simply becomes all that is in Gods way, or hindering Gods plan. Even the concept of hell dosent actuly appear in the bible. the only thing close was a description of Gahena, the pit of fire out side of Jherico ( i think it was) where they put all their rubbish, and the bodies of criminals after they killed them. The actual concept of hell came from dante's paintings, not from the bible. Satan, the falling star from heven, was a description of the fall of king nebecenezar. not of an angel being sent from heaven for doing wrong.

If you want me to clarify or be more specific on any of this, please let me know, i may not have expressed it very clearly.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
The thing is with 'Satan Worshippers' is that they believe in something entirely unlike the devil which is conceived of by Christian society. They think that the Bible is essentially propaganda put out by the true evil God, while Satan is the good guy, being repressed by the domineering Evil God...

or something like that. No one in their right mind would worship something which guarantees them eternal torment. (Even if it got them 'Preferential treatment'...because preferential treatment of eternal torture, is still eternal torture...)
 
  • #42
Originally posted by Another God
No one in their right mind would worship something which guarantees them eternal torment. (Even if it got them 'Preferential treatment'...because preferential treatment of eternal torture, is still eternal torture...)

not sure about that. if you take the descrition of what the devil likes, and what hell is ment to be full of cause it is un god like - ie, the 7 dedly sins - then why does hell have to be eternal tourment? why is it not filled with lust and greet, and gluttony, and vanity, and all those things that humans love?

What is ment to be in heven? no huge amounts of glorious food, no wild nights, no beautiful people running everywhere - a yearning for these things landed you in hell on eath.

it is hard to think that the world is simply a "well, if you can hold out on all the good things in life while you are on earth, you shall get your fill of them eternaly in heaven" deal. if they are so against God while we are alive, then tell me, what is in heaven?

so why can't hell be eternal bliss? there is a quote that goes somthing like "Id rather go to hell cause between you and me, i think the devil would have more to talk about" not sure where it is from. But he's got a point.
 
  • #43
Originally posted by Dark Wing
so why can't hell be eternal bliss? there is a quote that goes somthing like "Id rather go to hell cause between you and me, i think the devil would have more to talk about" not sure where it is from. But he's got a point.
Yes, imagine a sado-masochist entering his own paradise. :wink:

While I also understand heaven and hell are pretty much what you make of it. The only reason why hell exists is to give the Devil a viable alternative to being at "eternal odds" with those who can co-exist without the need to take it out on someone else.
 
  • #44
Hmmm some very interesting posts here, i will ahve to post a more interesting reply when i can think of one.
 
  • #45
Originally posted by Iacchus32
Yes, imagine a sado-masochist entering his own paradise. :wink:

While I also understand heaven and hell are pretty much what you make of it. The only reason why hell exists is to give the Devil a viable alternative to being at "eternal odds" with those who can co-exist without the need to take it out on someone else.

Taken that Heaven and Hell are simply what you make of it as there seems to be nothing "writtern" as such, then its quite viable to believe in God and the Devil. You can believe anything you want to, (not as in you can believe a light if off when it is on, more like you can choose to believe anything if you are a christian weighted in the direction of contemplating the exsistance of The Devil and God).

If you want to, and it seems reasonable to you, then believe in both. If it dosent seem reasonable, then those who believe in both should be putting up the arguments for their co-existance so we can all have a look at them. Then we can get into a "is it logically reasonable to believe in both the Devil and God".

It could be brought down to the Problem of evil, i guess. If God IS what the Christians (not neccesarily what the bible) says he is - ie omnicient, omnipotent and omni benevolant, then can the Devil exist? it seems that one of these traits have to go. Persoanlly, i do not believe that if there is a God he could be omni benevolant. even from looking at his text, there is no way omni benevolance can be seen as a trait.

But there may be good reason for the divil to exist even in this secenario - ie the free will defence - but still we have a problem here - an OMNI BENEVOLANT God should not be able to even wacth evil, even if it was for a so called "greater Godd" the most quoted argument in my knowledge for this argument is the so called "hero" argument - A hero is a good thing - is it worth the small amount of pain and 'evil' that is present (ie, a building on fire, or a village under attack) if it then allows for a "hero" to come along and save it? this is an "extreem good" that's is only avalible to be seen / experienced in the event of evil?

but this goes very deeply into the nature of God and then i guess the Nature of the Devil, and i am not sure this post wants to go there. if you are interested in going there, i am more than willing, it one of the more interesting debates in the philosophy of religion that i know of.
 
  • #46
Originally posted by Dark Wing
Taken that Heaven and Hell are simply what you make of it as there seems to be nothing "writtern" as such, then its quite viable to believe in God and the Devil. You can believe anything you want to, (not as in you can believe a light if off when it is on, more like you can choose to believe anything if you are a christian weighted in the direction of contemplating the exsistance of The Devil and God).
I don't know that I've made myself clear here? However, this (the nature of heaven and hell) has been discussed in depth on a couple of other threads, Hell? and https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1072. If you would like to bring some ideas from there and post them here that would be fine or, if you look at some of my replies at the beginning of this thread, starting on page 2 I believe, then maybe you can reply to that?
 
  • #47
When I was growing up Lucifer, Satan and the devil seemed to be used interchangebly which confused me no end. Later as I read in the Bible and was taught by more knowledgeable people I leaned that Lucifer was the brightest angel in Heaven and one of God's favorites but he rebelled against the will of God and talked other angels into rebelling also. One of these was Satan. Satan who is/was the prince of the earth/world (see John N.T.) was the spiritual being in charge of the Earth and all it's inhabitants. It was this Satan who tempted Adam and Eve into disobeying God and God's will. This is supposedly the fall of Man.
In the New Testament, the book of John, Jesus defeated Satan and took all of his power from him. Satan is without power over us or anything except for that power which we give him; i.e. we worship him or let him persuade us into doing something wrong, evil or against the will of God.
Supposedly Lucifer in being held in isolation and Satan is being held powerless on Earth and in isolation as is the Earth and consequently us, until judgement is passed upon them and us. This is supposedly why we see no evidence of God on earth.
None of this has anything to do with the Devil, who as I understand it is a product of Zoroaster who Iacchus32 mentioned earlier. Nor have I been able to find any mention of Hell or eternal damnation and punishment in the New Testament. I haven't read all of the O.T. so I don't know about there. To me the word "evil" has always been an adjective not a noun.
It seems to me that to belief in both God and the Devil in constant battle over our souls is a metaphor of our interal struggle between what we think is right, good and bad, evil. If it isn't that but a belief that the Devil and Hell actually exist, then it seems to me that this is polytheism, a belief in two gods of nearly equal power.
This I do not believe in and wonder at Christian who profess to and claim to believe in the literal translation of the Bible or fundamentalism. They are either IMO ignorant of what they are saying and implying or they are far better mental gymnasts and jugglers than I am.

BTW Sin as I understand it, is knowly disobeying or going against the will of God. What evil we do to each other as well as ourselves are trespasses not sins. Sins can only be commited against God; hense, "Forgive us our sins and we forgive those who trespass against us." in the Lords prayer.

All of this is a mental compilation and reconcilliation of what I have read, studied and been told over the years and are from many different scources. In short append IMO to all of it or take it for what it's worth though some of it is based on some authority or another.
 
  • #48
Originally posted by Iacchus32
I don't know that I've made myself clear here? However, this (the nature of heaven and hell) has been discussed in depth on a couple of other threads, Hell? and https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1072. If you would like to bring some ideas from there and post them here that would be fine or, if you look at some of my replies at the beginning of this thread, starting on page 2 I believe, then maybe you can reply to that?

thankyou for this, i will most certianly look at these links... this is a subject that i have great interest in, and am always interested in new opinions in this area... i have not seen much or read much on peoples thoughts on the nature of these two worlds. i will look and reply to them there...
 
  • #49
Originally posted by Royce
When I was growing up Lucifer, Satan and the devil seemed to be used interchangebly which confused me no end. Later as I read in the Bible and was taught by more knowledgeable people I leaned that Lucifer was the brightest angel in Heaven and one of God's favorites but he rebelled against the will of God and talked other angels into rebelling also. One of these was Satan. Satan who is/was the prince of the earth/world (see John N.T.) was the spiritual being in charge of the Earth and all it's inhabitants. It was this Satan who tempted Adam and Eve into disobeying God and God's will. This is supposedly the fall of Man.

This is very interesting for me to hear about. i have never heard of lucifer being an angel held in respect by God who rebelled. Do you know where they got this from, i would be very interested in reaserching more into this area.

Satan, however, that is an intersting topic. I was aware of him ebing named the prince of men, and that does not surprise me much, though i would like to know where they did get the refence of him also being an angel of God.

as far as i can tell, the refrence most used to describe Satans decent from the heavens is where they are describing a falling star in the old testement around the time of the king Nebecaneza - but how they related that to being the fall of satan, and not the fall of the king, i do not know, nor will they tell me, nor does it explain how Satan could have been around on Earth rebelling and making Adam and Eve sin. If you could post me some refrences, i would like to look at their material for this, it is of great interest to me.


In the New Testament, the book of John, Jesus defeated Satan and took all of his power from him. Satan is without power over us or anything except for that power which we give him; i.e. we worship him or let him persuade us into doing something wrong, evil or against the will of God.

Yes, it is true that jesus defeated satan in the desert. But then he took all of his power? i am not aware of this refrence, plase post the quotes for me to look at.

A far as i could make it, the 'defeating' of satan was simply him ignoring the pharacies and the sagusies who were following him around in the desert, trying to get him to show off his powers. he enterd the desert with no food and no water, and they were telling him to turn rocks into food, and to call down leauges of angels to show off the fact that he had this power. but as John said, there are only 3 real sins - the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and pride in life. He defeated all these things, and hence defeated Satan. Satan, as far as my reading, has never been some mystical entity or fallen angel, but has simply been the incarnation of ANYONE that is in the way of what you are doing. You are challanging God? you are Gods Adversary, which is all 'Satin" actully means. God is Trying to kill you? the God is your adversary, and hence is Satan. I have writtern a post describing this in more detail a little back if you wish more on this, then let me know and i will try to explain what i have come to think of as far as Satan is concerned. Any information you wish me to read, plase post it for me, i am more than interested in this topic and the things people have said about it, and any writings describing them as Angels will be more than welcome reading for me.

Supposedly Lucifer in being held in isolation and Satan is being held powerless on Earth and in isolation as is the Earth and consequently us, until judgement is passed upon them and us. This is supposedly why we see no evidence of God on earth.


this is impressive. any more explanation on where this theory came from would be very welcome.

It seems to me that to belief in both God and the Devil in constant battle over our souls is a metaphor of our interal struggle between what we think is right, good and bad, evil. If it isn't that but a belief that the Devil and Hell actually exist, then it seems to me that this is polytheism, a belief in two gods of nearly equal power.


maybe. but again, that just depends on what you mean as the devil, and weather God has let him live and exist for reasons of freewill (a defence that seems rather pointless from my prespective of what evil actually is) if God is still able to dystroy the devil if he wishes, but leaves him there for some reason not known to us (a very dodgy defence) then it does not need to be polytheism...

This I do not believe in and wonder at Christian who profess to and claim to believe in the literal translation of the Bible or fundamentalism. They are either IMO ignorant of what they are saying and implying or they are far better mental gymnasts and jugglers than I am.


what do you take to litral translation of the bible? The devil and Lucifer never actuly apear in the bible, nor does the concept of the trinity or going to heven or hell when you die. infact, hell is not even mentioned. Satin was always just a wrod for adversary. this is why i wish to know your sources, as i have never seen such things mentioned in the bible. but if you have read somthing i have not, then please, i would like you to post any new information you have for me.

All of this is a mental compilation and reconcilliation of what I have read, studied and been told over the years and are from many different scources. In short append IMO to all of it or take it for what it's worth though some of it is based on some authority or another.

ok, but if you do have any sources... please, i would really like to see where you have come across your ideas and what makes you think this way..
 
  • #50
Originally posted by Dark Wing
thankyou for this, i will most certianly look at these links... this is a subject that i have great interest in, and am always interested in new opinions in this area... i have not seen much or read much on peoples thoughts on the nature of these two worlds. i will look and reply to them there...
I also recommend the thread on Heaven?, as it includes some of the material that I thought was in the Hell? thread.

While one of the best books in my opinion is Emanuel Swedenborg's, Heaven and Hell, available through the Swedenborg Foundation. I've quoted from this from time to time, and believe I've quoted it in the links mentioned above.
 
Back
Top