Can you calculate water velocity from m=f/A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Sanderson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating water velocity from fire hydrants and hoses using the Freeman formula, where Q=AV (quantity of water equals area times velocity). Velocity can be derived from Bernoulli's Equation, V=\sqrt{2gh}, substituting pressure for head height. A question is raised about using the equation P=F/A (where F=ma) to determine velocity from a 1m x 1m hose under a constant pressure of 100kPa. Responses clarify that this approach is not valid, as it misinterprets the forces involved in water flow. The consensus is to rely on Bernoulli's equation for accurate calculations.
Jim Sanderson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was putting together some information to calculate water flow rates from fire hydrants and hoses. I have attached a copy in case anyone would be interested to have a look and point out any issues.

We use the Freeman formula for this which makes it pretty easy. Q=AV Q is quantity of water, A is area of outlet, V is velocity. To calculate velocity we use Bernoulli's Equation V=\sqrt{2gh} g=gravity h=head or height of water source above outlet. As we normally use pressure not head we would substitute gh for P in kPA i.e. 10m of head pressure is equal to 9.91 x 10 = 98.1kPa.

I was wondering if we could calculate the velocity of the water using P=F/A F=ma?

Question: If we had a large square hose that was 1m x 1m with a cap on the end. There is a pressure gauge in the cap that reads 100kPa. Assume there is a massive dam 10m above the hose outlet, this will provide a constant water supply at 100kPa (although when water is flowing the pressure will be nil. If we were to remove the cap, what would be the velocity of the water as it leaves the hose? Can we use P=F/A F=ma?

Thanks for any assistance.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you cannot find equivalent force on an element of water. P = F/A, where F is lift. In the large reservoir, we assume F equals gravity; however it is not, or water won't flow.

BTW, Q is quatity rate of water.
 
I suspect if you tried to derive yourself an equation starting with f=ma, you'd just end up deriving Bernoulli's equation. So just use that.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top