Can You Convert an Integral Into an Infinite Series?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting the integral from 0 to 1 of 2dx/[(3x^4) + 16] into an infinite series. The user initially expresses the integral as a series involving a sigma notation and evaluates it. Feedback indicates that the approach is generally correct, particularly in using the geometric series formula. However, a minor error is noted in the exponent of the final expression, which should be 4n+1 instead of 4n-1. Overall, the method employed is validated, with a small correction needed for accuracy.
maxpowers_00
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi, i need a little help calculating the infinite series sorry if it seems confusing, but i don't know how to put in the sigma or intergral symbols i did my best to make it clear:

i am sopposed to express (integral from 0 to 1) of 2dx/[(3x^4)+16] as a sum of an infinite series here's what i did:

the (integral from 0 to 1) of 2dx/[(3x^4) + 16]
i found that the series of 2dx/[(3x^4)+16] = 1/8* (sigma from n=0 to infinity) of (-1)^n *(3x^4/16)^n

i then pulled out the constants and got

1/8 * (sigma from n=0 to infinity) (-1)^n * (3/16)^n (integral from 0 to 1) (x^4n)

after evaluating the integral i got for my infinit series

1/8 (sigma from n=0 to infinity) (-1)^n (3/16)^n [1^(4n-1)/4n-1]

i just wanted to know if this seemed like it was the right way.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maxpowers_00 said:
i just wanted to know if this seemed like it was the right way.
Yes. I didn't look at the details, but you seem to have the correct approach.
 


Yes, your approach seems to be correct. You have correctly expressed the given integral as a sum of an infinite series using the formula for the geometric series. However, there is a small error in your final answer. The correct expression for the infinite series would be:

1/8 * (sigma from n=0 to infinity) (-1)^n * (3/16)^n [1^(4n+1)/4n+1]

The exponent should be 4n+1 instead of 4n-1. Other than that, your method is correct. Keep up the good work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top