Can You Derive F = gamma^3*ma from Newton's Second Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beecher
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation F = gamma^3 * ma from Newton's second law, where F = dp/dt and p = gamma * mv. Participants express confusion about the derivation process, particularly how to handle the differentiation of gamma, which is dependent on velocity. Clarifications suggest that instead of integrating, one should directly differentiate and rearrange the terms for simplicity. Key insights include expressing gamma in a more manageable form and using the chain rule for differentiation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between force, momentum, and relativistic effects in physics.
beecher
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Newton's second law is given by F = dp/dt. If the force is always parallel to the velocity, show that F = gamma3ma

Homework Equations



p = gamma*mv
gamma = 1/(1-v2/c2)1/2

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no clue where to begin. This is what I've done so far, but I don't think I'm even on the right track.

F = dp/dt = gamma3ma = [1/(1-v2/c2)1/2]3ma
=1/(1-v2/c2)3/2ma
=1/(1 - 3v2/c2 + 3v4/c4 - v6/c6)1/2ma

Thats as far as i get on the right side.

For the left, all i can manage is dp/dt = d/dx p = d/dx gamma*mv
This is where I get confused. gamma and m are constant, so does dp/dt = gamma*m*dv/dt?

Some clarification would be great.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you in Modern Physics and answering this for your Russian Prof?
 
You're taking the hard route, you're trying to integrate the given expression, into the derivative. Just take the derivative, and rearrange.

Some pointers:

Express \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}=({1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}})^{-\tfrac{1}{2}

That should make taking the derivative much more simple.

Another bit that should help you is: \frac{d({1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}})}{dt}=\frac{-2v\cdot\dot v}{c^2}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top