Can You Escape the Gravitational Pull of a Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xeinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Xeinstein
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Black holes irresistibly suck things in. That is a common misconception in science fiction. In fact, a spherical black hole of mass M attracts exterior mass no more strongly than a spherical star of mass M. Their exterior spacetimes are the same Schwarzschild geometry. But there is a sense in which it is more difficult to escape from close to a black hole than from a Newtonian center of acctraction of the same mass. Imagine using the thrust of a rocket to hover at a constant Schwarzschild coordinate radius R outside a spherical black hole of mass M. How much thrust would the rocket of mass m need to exert? Would it be infinitely larger as the radius R approaches 2M?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Xeinstein said:
Black holes irresistibly suck things in. That is a common misconception in science fiction. In fact, a spherical black home of mass M attracts exterior mass no more strongly than a spherical star of mass M. Their exterior spacetimes are the same Schwarzschild geometry.
Imagine using the thrust of a rocket to hover at a constant Schwarzschild coordinate radius R outside a spherical black hole of mass M. How much thrust would the rocket of mass m need to exert? Would it be infinitely larger as the radius R approaches 2M?

Yes, the thrust required approaches infinity as the event horizon is approached. See https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1633296&postcount=5".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's true, but the black hole is _deceptively_ massive. If you were approaching a red giant, because it was so large and so hot you'd know not to get so close that you'd be sucked in. If you were approaching a black hole, gravity would be felt much further away from the surface of the hole than it would from the surface of a star, and also there'd be no heat radiating from it, so you might not even know it was there until it was too late.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
508
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top