Can You Escape the Gravitational Pull of a Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xeinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Xeinstein
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Black holes irresistibly suck things in. That is a common misconception in science fiction. In fact, a spherical black hole of mass M attracts exterior mass no more strongly than a spherical star of mass M. Their exterior spacetimes are the same Schwarzschild geometry. But there is a sense in which it is more difficult to escape from close to a black hole than from a Newtonian center of acctraction of the same mass. Imagine using the thrust of a rocket to hover at a constant Schwarzschild coordinate radius R outside a spherical black hole of mass M. How much thrust would the rocket of mass m need to exert? Would it be infinitely larger as the radius R approaches 2M?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Xeinstein said:
Black holes irresistibly suck things in. That is a common misconception in science fiction. In fact, a spherical black home of mass M attracts exterior mass no more strongly than a spherical star of mass M. Their exterior spacetimes are the same Schwarzschild geometry.
Imagine using the thrust of a rocket to hover at a constant Schwarzschild coordinate radius R outside a spherical black hole of mass M. How much thrust would the rocket of mass m need to exert? Would it be infinitely larger as the radius R approaches 2M?

Yes, the thrust required approaches infinity as the event horizon is approached. See https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1633296&postcount=5".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's true, but the black hole is _deceptively_ massive. If you were approaching a red giant, because it was so large and so hot you'd know not to get so close that you'd be sucked in. If you were approaching a black hole, gravity would be felt much further away from the surface of the hole than it would from the surface of a star, and also there'd be no heat radiating from it, so you might not even know it was there until it was too late.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
584
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top