Is Using a Catapult on an Asteroid a Viable Propulsion Method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dmt669
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
Using a catapult on an asteroid to propel it towards Earth is theoretically viable by applying the principles of momentum and impulse. When a chunk of the asteroid's mass is ejected in the opposite direction of Earth, the asteroid experiences a change in momentum, resulting in a velocity shift towards Earth. This concept relies on the conservation of momentum, which dictates that the asteroid must compensate for the mass it loses. The discussion humorously likens the scenario to an introductory physics course, highlighting the unconventional nature of the idea. Overall, the feasibility of this propulsion method hinges on fundamental physics principles.
Dmt669
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. ON a distant asteroid, a large catapult is used to "throw" chunks of stone into space. COuld such a device be used as a propulsion system to move the asteroid closer to earth? (need help in terms of momentum,impulse, and all that)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dmt669 said:
1. ON a distant asteroid, a large catapult is used to "throw" chunks of stone into space. COuld such a device be used as a propulsion system to move the asteroid closer to earth? (need help in terms of momentum,impulse, and all that)
The asteroid must follow the conservation of momenum.
Lets say its moving at a velocity wrt earth.
if you catapult a chunk of the asteroids mass in the opposite direction of earth, then the asteroid is going to have to make up for that change in momentum by changing its velocity towards earth.
 
CLOSER to the earth?!

What is this, an intro physics course for evil geniuses? :eek:
 
quasar987 said:
CLOSER to the earth?!

What is this, an intro physics course for evil geniuses? :eek:
:smile: I saw another problem on here where they were trying to kill a scuba diver by giving him the benz. No wonder crime is on the way up!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top